IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v95y2010i1p74-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

There is a long way to go: A nationwide survey of professional training for mental health practitioners in China

Author

Listed:
  • Gao, Xiao
  • Jackson, Todd
  • Chen, Hong
  • Liu, Yanmei
  • Wang, Ruiqiang
  • Qian, Mingyi
  • Huang, Xiting

Abstract

Objective This nationwide survey of professional training for mental health practitioners (i.e., psychiatrists, psychiatric nurses, clinical psychologists, and the counselors working in industry, prisons, and schools) investigated sociodemographic characteristics, training experiences, and training perceptions of mental health service providers in China.Methods Participants included service providers recruited from hospitals, universities, high/middle schools, private mental health service organizations and counseling centers operated by government, prisons or corporations from 25 provinces and four cities directly under the Central Government in China. In order to obtain a broad and representative sample, stratified multi-stage sampling procedures were utilized. From a total of 2000 questionnaire packets distributed via regular mail, the final sample comprised of 1391 respondents (525 men, 866 women).Results About 70% of the sample had a bachelor's level education or lower degree, only 36.4% majored in psychology, and nearly 60% were employed part time. Fewer than half of participants were certified and nearly 40% reported no affiliation with any 'professional' association. Training and continuing education programs were reported to be primarily short term and theory-based with limited assessment and follow-up. A high proportion of respondents reported having received no supervision or opportunities for case conferences or consultations. With respect to perceptions of and satisfaction with training, many agreed that training had been very helpful to their work but quality of supervision and the capability of supervisors were common issues of concern.Conclusions In light of these findings, three general recommendations were made to improve the quality of training among mental health service providers in China. First, increased input from professional organizations of various disciplines involving mental health service provision is needed to guide training and shape policy. Second, universities and colleges should have a more vital role in developing accredited professional training programs. Finally, on-the-job supervision and continuing education should be mandated within discipline-specific training programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao, Xiao & Jackson, Todd & Chen, Hong & Liu, Yanmei & Wang, Ruiqiang & Qian, Mingyi & Huang, Xiting, 2010. "There is a long way to go: A nationwide survey of professional training for mental health practitioners in China," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 74-81, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:95:y:2010:i:1:p:74-81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(09)00289-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xuemei Li & Weijun Zhang & Yan Lin & Xiulan Zhang & Zhiyong Qu & Xiaohua Wang & Yurong Zhang & Huiwen Xu & Shuliang Zhao & Yafang Li & Donghua Tian, 2014. "Pathways to psychiatric care of patients from rural regions: A general-hospital-based study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 60(3), pages 280-289, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:95:y:2010:i:1:p:74-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.