IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v90y2009i2-3p239-246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health information technology and physician perceptions of quality of care and satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Davis, Karen
  • Doty, Michelle McEvoy
  • Shea, Katherine
  • Stremikis, Kristof

Abstract

Objective To examine across seven countries the relationship between physician office information system capacity and the quality of care.Design Multivariate analysis of a cross-sectional 2006 random survey of primary care physicians in seven countries: Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, United Kingdom, and United States.Main outcome measures coordination and safety of care, care for chronically ill patients, and satisfaction with practice of medicine.Results The study finds significant disparities in the quality of health care between practices with low information system capacity and those with high technical capacity after controlling for within country differences and practice size. There were significant physician satisfaction differences with the overall experience of practicing medicine by information system level.Conclusions For policy leaders, the seven-nation survey suggests that health systems that promote information system infrastructure are better able to address coordination and safety issues, particularly for patients with multiple chronic conditions, as well as to maintain primary care physician workforce satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Davis, Karen & Doty, Michelle McEvoy & Shea, Katherine & Stremikis, Kristof, 2009. "Health information technology and physician perceptions of quality of care and satisfaction," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(2-3), pages 239-246, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:90:y:2009:i:2-3:p:239-246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(08)00223-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emmanouilidou, Maria & Burke, Maria, 2013. "A thematic review and a policy-analysis agenda of Electronic Health Records in the Greek National Health System," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 31-37.
    2. Ben-Assuli, Ofir, 2015. "Electronic health records, adoption, quality of care, legal and privacy issues and their implementation in emergency departments," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 287-297.
    3. Anand Chand & Suwastika Naidu, 2017. "Health Care Service Quality and Availability of Skilled Health Workforce: A Panel Data Modelling of the UK, USA and Israel," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(10), pages 152-152, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:90:y:2009:i:2-3:p:239-246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.