IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v87y2008i3p316-325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do general practitioners assess the criteria for due care for euthanasia in concrete cases?

Author

Listed:
  • Hanssen-de Wolf, Johanna E.
  • Pasman, H. Roeline W.
  • Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D.

Abstract

Objective In the Netherlands the law states that physicians are allowed to grant a request for euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide (EAS) if specific criteria for due care are met. This study investigated which sources physicians use to determine whether three of these criteria (unbearable and hopeless suffering, and no realistic alternatives for treatment) are met.Methods The data were collected for the project Support and Consultation on Euthanasia in the Netherlands. General practitioners (GPs) received a written questionnaire concerning the most recent request for EAS that they had received. Of the 3614 (60%) GPs who returned the questionnaire, 1681 described the most recent request for EAS.Results The study shows that physicians used different types of sources, and more than one source, to determine whether the criteria were met. More sources were used when the criteria were met or when a request resulted in EAS. The determination of every criterion required a different approach, but for all criteria discussions with colleagues were important.Conclusions Using less sources when a criterion is not met could possibly lead to less extensive consideration of the criteria, and therefore to assessing too easily that the request does not meet the criteria for due care.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanssen-de Wolf, Johanna E. & Pasman, H. Roeline W. & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D., 2008. "How do general practitioners assess the criteria for due care for euthanasia in concrete cases?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 316-325, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:87:y:2008:i:3:p:316-325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(08)00003-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jansen-van der Weide, Marijke Catharina & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje Dorien & van der Wal, Gerrit, 2004. "Implementation of the project `Support and Consultation on Euthanasia in The Netherlands' (SCEN)," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 365-373, September.
    2. Rurup, Mette L. & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D. & Jansen-van der Weide, Marijke C. & van der Wal, Gerrit, 2005. "When being `tired of living' plays an important role in a request for euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide: patient characteristics and the physician's decision," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 157-166, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jansen-van der Weide, Marijke Catharina & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje Dorien & van der Wal, Gerrit, 2007. "Quality of consultation and the project `Support and Consultation on Euthanasia in the Netherlands' (SCEN)," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 97-106, January.
    2. Smets, Tinne & Bilsen, Johan & Cohen, Joachim & Rurup, Mette L. & De Keyser, Els & Deliens, Luc, 2009. "The medical practice of euthanasia in Belgium and The Netherlands: Legal notification, control and evaluation procedures," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(2-3), pages 181-187, May.
    3. Brinkman-Stoppelenburg, Arianne & Vergouwe, Yvonne & van der Heide, Agnes & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D., 2014. "Obligatory consultation of an independent physician on euthanasia requests in the Netherlands: What influences the SCEN physicians judgment of the legal requirements of due care?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 75-81.
    4. Florijn, Barend W., 2018. "Extending’ euthanasia to those ‘tired of living’ in the Netherlands could jeopardize a well-functioning practice of physicians’ assessment of a patient's request for death," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 315-319.
    5. van den Berg, Vera E & Zomers, Margot L & van Thiel, Ghislaine JMW & Leget, Carlo JW & van Delden, Johannes JM & van Wijngaarden, Els J, 2022. "Requests for euthanasia or assisted suicide of people without (severe) illness," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(8), pages 824-830.
    6. Van Wesemael, Yanna & Cohen, Joachim & Bilsen, Johan & Smets, Tinne & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje & Distelmans, Wim & Deliens, Luc, 2012. "Implementation of a service for physicians’ consultation and information in euthanasia requests in Belgium," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(3), pages 272-278.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:87:y:2008:i:3:p:316-325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.