IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v87y2008i1p112-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

United States rural hospital quality in the Hospital Compare database--Accounting for hospital characteristics

Author

Listed:
  • Goldman, L. Elizabeth
  • Dudley, R. Adams

Abstract

Background Rural hospitals in the United States have demonstrated lower adherence to evidence based guidelines than their urban counterparts in national public reporting initiatives. We compared the quality of rural hospitals participating in a public reporting initiative to that of their urban counterparts using Hospital Compare, a new national database containing process measures.Methods Cross-sectional analyses of hospitals participating in Hospital Compare in 2005, evaluating percent adherence to guidelines for 10 processes of care for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) using multivariable linear regression analyses.Results Participating rural hospitals demonstrated lower adherence to evidence based guidelines in MI and HF quality measures (pÂ

Suggested Citation

  • Goldman, L. Elizabeth & Dudley, R. Adams, 2008. "United States rural hospital quality in the Hospital Compare database--Accounting for hospital characteristics," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 112-127, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:87:y:2008:i:1:p:112-127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(08)00037-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sacarny, Adam, 2018. "Adoption and learning across hospitals: The case of a revenue-generating practice," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 142-164.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:87:y:2008:i:1:p:112-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.