IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v83y2007i2-3p343-352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of the impact of U.S. and Canadian cigarette pack warning label requirements on tobacco industry profitability and the public health

Author

Listed:
  • Givel, Michael

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Givel, Michael, 2007. "A comparison of the impact of U.S. and Canadian cigarette pack warning label requirements on tobacco industry profitability and the public health," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(2-3), pages 343-352, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:83:y:2007:i:2-3:p:343-352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(06)00290-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edelman, Murray, 1960. "Symbols and Political Quiescence," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(3), pages 695-704, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tatiana Andreeva & Konstantin Krasovsky, 2011. "Recall of tobacco pack health warnings by the population in Ukraine and its association with the perceived tobacco health hazard," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 56(3), pages 253-262, June.
    2. John J. Donohue III & Benjamin Ewing & David Pelopquin, 2010. "Rethinking America's Illegal Drug Policy," NBER Chapters, in: Controlling Crime: Strategies and Tradeoffs, pages 215-281, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Le Anh Nguyen Long & Megan Foster & Gwen Arnold, 2019. "The impact of stakeholder engagement on local policy decision making," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(4), pages 549-571, December.
    2. Frimpong Boamah, Emmanuel & Sumberg, James, 2019. "The long overhang of bad decisions in agro-industrial development: Sugar and tomato paste in Ghana," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:83:y:2007:i:2-3:p:343-352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.