IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v6y1986i2p119-143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The economic cost of illness in the Federal Republic of Germany in the year 1980

Author

Listed:
  • Henke, Klaus-Dirk
  • Behrens, Cornelia S.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Henke, Klaus-Dirk & Behrens, Cornelia S., 1986. "The economic cost of illness in the Federal Republic of Germany in the year 1980," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 119-143.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:6:y:1986:i:2:p:119-143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0168-8510(86)90002-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shiell, Alan & Law, Matthew G, 2001. "The cost of hepatitis C and the cost-effectiveness of its prevention," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 121-131, November.
    2. Belaya, V. & Hansen, H. & Pinoir, B., 2013. "Measuring the Costs of Foodborne Diseases: A Review and Classification of the Literature," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 48, March.
    3. Susie El Saadany & Douglas Coyle & Antonio Giulivi & Mohammad Afzal, 2005. "Economic burden of hepatitis C in Canada and the potential impact of prevention," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 6(2), pages 159-165, June.
    4. Johan Polder & Willem Meerding & Luc Bonneux & Paul Maas, 2005. "A cross-national perspective on cost of illness," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 6(3), pages 223-232, September.
    5. Wiseman, Virginia & Mooney, Gavin, 1998. "SOUNDING BOARD: Burden of illness estimates for priority setting: a debate revisited," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 243-251, March.
    6. Smith, Kirsteen & Wright, Ken, 1996. "Costs of mental illness in Britain," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 61-73, January.
    7. Lu, Tsung-Hsueh & Jen, Ian & Chou, Yiing-Jenq & Chang, Hong-Jen, 2005. "Evaluating the comparability of different grouping schemes for mortality and morbidity," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 151-159, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:6:y:1986:i:2:p:119-143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.