IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v62y2002i3p227-242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Priority setting for health technology assessment in The Netherlands: principles and practice

Author

Listed:
  • Oortwijn, Wija J.
  • Vondeling, Hindrik
  • van Barneveld, Teus
  • van Vugt, Christel
  • Bouter, Lex M.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Oortwijn, Wija J. & Vondeling, Hindrik & van Barneveld, Teus & van Vugt, Christel & Bouter, Lex M., 2002. "Priority setting for health technology assessment in The Netherlands: principles and practice," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 227-242, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:62:y:2002:i:3:p:227-242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(02)00037-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yasuaki Masumoto, 1996. "Persistent Spectral Hole-Burning In Semiconductor Quantum Dots," Surface Review and Letters (SRL), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(01), pages 143-150.
    2. Linda Davies & Mike Drummond & Panos Papanikoloau, 1999. "Prioritising investments in health technology assessment: can we assess the potential value for money?," Working Papers 170chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Douw, Karla & Vondeling, Hindrik & Oortwijn, Wija, 2006. "Priority setting for horizon scanning of new health technologies in Denmark: Views of health care stakeholders and health economists," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 334-345, May.
    2. Sven E. Hug & Mirjam Aeschbach, 2020. "Criteria for assessing grant applications: a systematic review," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:62:y:2002:i:3:p:227-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.