IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v154y2025ics0168851025000284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants and associated costs of unmet healthcare need and their association with resource allocation. Insights from Finland

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen, Lien
  • Häkkinen, Unto

Abstract

The Finnish counties’ allocation formulae for welfare services are based on utilisation collected from national registers and do not account for unmet needs. We investigated factors associated with self-reported unmet healthcare need and associated costs of primary and total healthcare, as well as the association between regional variation in unmet needs and utilisation-based need. The 2017–2018 FinSote survey data were matched with 2017 register data (n = 13,800). Costs of healthcare visits were used as a proxy for utilisation. We applied three logit regressions to explore factors related to self-reported unmet need and eight two-part models to analyse cost data. Analysis weights were developed and used. Those reporting unmet need were female, unemployed and foreign-born, and had multiple morbidities and poor self-assessed health. The highest income quintile and good self-rated quality of life were negatively associated with self-reported unmet need. A person with unmet needs spent an additional €32.2–183.9 and €269.7–963.7 yearly on primary and total healthcare, respectively. Regional differences in self-reported unmet need were not fully correlated with the need indices used in the regional resource allocation. To account for unmet need in budget allocations, self-reported unmet need and quality of life data should be collected more extensively and routinely. Addressing unmet need should be viewed as a long-term investment in primary care to reduce avoidable health inequalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen, Lien & Häkkinen, Unto, 2025. "Determinants and associated costs of unmet healthcare need and their association with resource allocation. Insights from Finland," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:154:y:2025:i:c:s0168851025000284
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025000284
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105272?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:154:y:2025:i:c:s0168851025000284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.