IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v154y2025ics0168851025000211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Avoidable visits to UK emergency departments from the patient perspective: A recursive bivariate probit approach

Author

Listed:
  • Calastri, Chiara
  • Buckell, John
  • Crastes dit Sourd, Romain

Abstract

Unsustainably high numbers of patients attending emergency departments (ED) is a serious issue worldwide, with consequences for the quality and timeliness of emergency care. Avoidable visits, i.e. unnecessary or that should be dealt with elsewhere, exacerbate this issue. Most studies focussed on avoidable attendances use clinical data collected by hospital staff, while this study relies on survey data collected from patients asked to recall their last ED attendance and reflect on its necessity. We apply a Recursive Bivariate Probit model to quantify the factors affecting patients' perception of an ED visit being avoidable (or not), unveiling how it relates to socio-demographic and contextual factors. We find that patients who do not trust their General Practitioner (GP) are less likely to think their ED visit was avoidable. The perception of whether an ED visit was avoidable is also associated with symptoms experienced, patients’ ethnicity and waiting time for a GP appointment.

Suggested Citation

  • Calastri, Chiara & Buckell, John & Crastes dit Sourd, Romain, 2025. "Avoidable visits to UK emergency departments from the patient perspective: A recursive bivariate probit approach," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:154:y:2025:i:c:s0168851025000211
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025000211
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105265?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:154:y:2025:i:c:s0168851025000211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.