IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v126y2022i10p1039-1050.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors associated with cervical cancer screening utilisation by people with physical disabilities: A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Chan, Dorothy N.S.
  • Law, Bernard M.H.
  • So, Winnie K.W.
  • Fan, Ning

Abstract

Previous studies showed that cervical cancer screening uptake among people with physical disabilities is low. A better understanding of the factors affecting their screening uptake is needed to devise strategies to address this issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Chan, Dorothy N.S. & Law, Bernard M.H. & So, Winnie K.W. & Fan, Ning, 2022. "Factors associated with cervical cancer screening utilisation by people with physical disabilities: A systematic review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(10), pages 1039-1050.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:126:y:2022:i:10:p:1039-1050
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.08.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851022002196
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.08.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bussière, Clémence & Le Vaillant, Marc & Pelletier-Fleury, Nathalie, 2015. "Screening for cervical cancer: What are the determinants among adults with disabilities living in institutions? Findings from a National Survey in France," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(6), pages 794-801.
    2. Kath Peters & Antoinette Cotton, 2015. "Barriers to breast cancer screening in Australia: experiences of women with physical disabilities," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3-4), pages 563-572, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goldzahl, Léontine, 2017. "Contributions of risk preference, time orientation and perceptions to breast cancer screening regularity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 147-157.
    2. Natallia Gray & Gabriel Picone, 2018. "Evidence of Large-Scale Social Interactions in Mammography in the United States," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 46(4), pages 441-457, December.
    3. Anne-Marie Konopka & Thomas Barnay & Nathalie Billaudeau & Christine Sevilla-Dedieu, 2019. "Les déterminants du recours au dépistage du cancer du col de l’utérus : une analyse départementale," Erudite Working Paper 2019-19, Erudite.
    4. George Kritsotakis & Petros Galanis & Emmanouil Papastefanakis & Flora Meidani & Anastas E. Philalithis & Athena Kalokairinou & Panayota Sourtzi, 2017. "Attitudes towards people with physical or intellectual disabilities among nursing, social work and medical students," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4951-4963, December.
    5. Clara Dugord & Carine Franc, 2022. "Trajectories and individual determinants of regular cancer screening use over a long period based on data from the French E3N cohort," Post-Print hal-04385507, HAL.
    6. Dugord, Clara & Franc, Carine, 2022. "Trajectories and individual determinants of regular cancer screening use over a long period based on data from the French E3N cohort," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:126:y:2022:i:10:p:1039-1050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.