IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v107y2012i2p249-257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increasing patient centredness in outpatient care through closer collaboration with patient groups?

Author

Listed:
  • Nickel, Stefan
  • Trojan, Alf
  • Kofahl, Christopher

Abstract

In Germany, “self-help friendliness” is an upcoming popular concept for the promotion of patient centredness through closer cooperation of health care services with self-help groups of chronically ill and/or disabled patients and their relatives. The study aimed at gathering information from physicians with special expertise in quality management on opportunities for and barriers against introducing more collaboration between physicians and self-help groups in outpatient care.

Suggested Citation

  • Nickel, Stefan & Trojan, Alf & Kofahl, Christopher, 2012. "Increasing patient centredness in outpatient care through closer collaboration with patient groups?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 249-257.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:107:y:2012:i:2:p:249-257
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.07.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851012001935
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.07.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rabeharisoa, Vololona, 2003. "The struggle against neuromuscular diseases in France and the emergence of the "partnership model" of patient organisation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(11), pages 2127-2136, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hedlund, M. & Landstad, B.J. & Tritter, J.Q., 2019. "The disciplining of self-help: Doing self-help the Norwegian way," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 34-41.
    2. Kofahl, Christopher & Trojan, Alf & Knesebeck, Olaf von dem & Nickel, Stefan, 2014. "Self-help friendliness: A German approach for strengthening the cooperation between self-help groups and health care professionals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 217-225.
    3. Eva Jangland & Noeman Mirza & Tiffany Conroy & Clair Merriman & Emiko Suzui & Akiko Nishimura & Ann Ewens, 2018. "Nursing students' understanding of the Fundamentals of Care: A cross‐sectional study in five countries," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2460-2472, June.
    4. Byers Vivienne & Fahey Daragh & Mullins Carol & Roe Carol, 2017. "The Patient Survey Programme: Transforming the patient experience in Irish healthcare," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 65(4), pages 83-99, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Epstein, Steven, 2016. "The politics of health mobilization in the United States: The promise and pitfalls of “disease constituencies”," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 246-254.
    2. Kofahl, Christopher & Trojan, Alf & Knesebeck, Olaf von dem & Nickel, Stefan, 2014. "Self-help friendliness: A German approach for strengthening the cooperation between self-help groups and health care professionals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 217-225.
    3. Katharina Hauck & Aki Tsuchiya, 2010. "Health mobility: implications for efficiency and equity in priority setting," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 6/10, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    4. Barbot, Janine, 2006. "How to build an "active" patient? The work of AIDS associations in France," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 538-551, February.
    5. Alexandre Trigo, 2016. "Innovation in the Era of Experience: The Changing Role of Users in Healthcare Innovation," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 12(2), pages 29-51.
    6. Steffensen, Mette B. & Matzen, Christina L. & Wadmann, Sarah, 2022. "Patient participation in priority setting: Co-existing participant roles," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    7. Salter, Brian & Zhou, Yinhua & Datta, Saheli, 2015. "Hegemony in the marketplace of biomedical innovation: Consumer demand and stem cell science," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 156-163.
    8. Rabeharisoa, Vololona, 2006. "From representation to mediation: The shaping of collective mobilization on muscular dystrophy in France," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 564-576, February.
    9. Lotje E. Siffels & Tamar Sharon & Andrew S. Hoffman, 2021. "The participatory turn in health and medicine: The rise of the civic and the need to ‘give back’ in data-intensive medical research," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Boon, Wouter P.C. & Moors, Ellen H.M. & Kuhlmann, Stefan & Smits, Ruud E.H.M., 2011. "Demand articulation in emerging technologies: Intermediary user organisations as co-producers?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 242-252, March.
    11. Edwards, Claire & Howlett, Etaoine, 2013. "Putting knowledge to trial: ‘ADHD parents’ and the evaluation of alternative therapeutic regimes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 34-41.
    12. Madeleine Akrich & Maire Leane & Celia Roberts & João Arriscado Nunes, 2012. "Practising childbirth activism: a politics of evidence," CSI Working Papers Series 023, Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation (CSI), Mines ParisTech.
    13. Nahuis, Roel & Stemerding, Dirk, 2013. "Genomics as a new research regime? Evidence from the Netherlands," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 676-687.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:107:y:2012:i:2:p:249-257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.