IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v107y2012i2p243-248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facts and figures about patient associations in the Netherlands between 2007 and 2009: Review of their activities and aims

Author

Listed:
  • Kamphuis, Helen
  • Hekkert, Karin
  • van Dongen, Marie-Christine
  • Kool, Tijn

Abstract

To facilitate empowerment, the government encourages patient associations to participate in policymaking discussions. To play a crucial role as one of the partners for the government in formulating policy on healthcare, information was needed about the activities and aims of Dutch patient associations. This article describes the development of the monitor in 2005 and 2006 and the most important outcomes and trends for 2007, 2008 and 2009.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamphuis, Helen & Hekkert, Karin & van Dongen, Marie-Christine & Kool, Tijn, 2012. "Facts and figures about patient associations in the Netherlands between 2007 and 2009: Review of their activities and aims," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 243-248.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:107:y:2012:i:2:p:243-248
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.06.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851012001662
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.06.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fischer, Julia & Van de Bovenkamp, Hester M., 2019. "The challenge of democratic patient representation: Understanding the representation work of patient organizations through methodological triangulation," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 109-114.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:107:y:2012:i:2:p:243-248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.