IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v105y2012i2p296-302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empathy and the application of the ‘unbearable suffering’ criterion in Dutch euthanasia practice

Author

Listed:
  • van Tol, Donald G.
  • Rietjens, Judith A.C.
  • van der Heide, Agnes

Abstract

A pivotal due care criterion for lawful euthanasia in the Netherlands is that doctors must be convinced that a patient requesting for euthanasia, suffers unbearably. Our study aims to find out how doctors judge if a patient suffers unbearably. How do doctors bridge the gap from 3rd person assessment to 1st person experience? We performed a qualitative interview study among 15 physicians, mainly general practitioners, who participated earlier in a related quantitative survey on the way doctors apply the suffering criterion. Results show that doctors follow different ‘cognitive routes’ when assessing a patients suffering in the context of a euthanasia request. Sometimes doctors do this imagining how she herself would experience the situation of the patient (‘imagine self’). Doctors may also try to adopt the perspective of the patient and imagine what the situation is like for this particular patient (‘imagine other’). Besides this we found that the (outcome of the) assessment is influenced by a doctor's private norms, values and emotions considering (the performance of) euthanasia. We conclude by arguing why doctors should be aware of both the ‘cognitive route’ followed as well as the influence of their own personal norms on the assessment of suffering in the context of euthanasia requests.

Suggested Citation

  • van Tol, Donald G. & Rietjens, Judith A.C. & van der Heide, Agnes, 2012. "Empathy and the application of the ‘unbearable suffering’ criterion in Dutch euthanasia practice," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(2), pages 296-302.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:105:y:2012:i:2:p:296-302
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.01.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851012000152
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.01.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Tol, Donald & Rietjens, Judith & van der Heide, Agnes, 2010. "Judgment of unbearable suffering and willingness to grant a euthanasia request by Dutch general practitioners," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(2-3), pages 166-172, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Florijn, Barend W., 2018. "Extending’ euthanasia to those ‘tired of living’ in the Netherlands could jeopardize a well-functioning practice of physicians’ assessment of a patient's request for death," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 315-319.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:105:y:2012:i:2:p:296-302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.