IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v87y2018icp93-100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal carbon storage in even- and uneven-aged forestry

Author

Listed:
  • Assmuth, Aino
  • Tahvonen, Olli

Abstract

We study the effects of forest carbon storage on optimal stand management by applying a model where optimal harvests are partial cuttings, implying uneven-aged forestry, or both partial cuttings and clearcuts, implying even-aged forestry. Optimal carbon storage postpones partial cuttings and increases stand volume along the rotation. Carbon pricing may shorten or lengthen the rotation period depending on interest rate and speed of carbon release from wood products. If the carbon price is high, the shadow value of forest biomass is negative, implying that a higher interest rate leads to higher stand density. In empirically realistic examples, carbon pricing causes a switch from clearcuts to continuous cover management rather than vice versa.

Suggested Citation

  • Assmuth, Aino & Tahvonen, Olli, 2018. "Optimal carbon storage in even- and uneven-aged forestry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 93-100.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:87:y:2018:i:c:p:93-100
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138993411730240X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Loisel, Patrice, 2020. "Under the risk of destructive event, are there differences between timber income based and carbon sequestration based silviculture?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Patto, João V. & Rosa, Renato, 2022. "Adapting to frequent fires: Optimal forest management revisited," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    3. Szajkó, Gabriella & Rácz, Viktor József & Kis, András, 2024. "The role of price incentives in enhancing carbon sequestration in the forestry sector of Hungary," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    4. Mäntymaa, Erkki & Artell, Janne & Forsman, Jukka T. & Juutinen, Artti, 2023. "Is it more important to increase carbon sequestration, biodiversity, or jobs? A case study of citizens' preferences for forest policy in Finland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    5. Kolo, Horst & Kindu, Mengistie & Knoke, Thomas, 2020. "Optimizing forest management for timber production, carbon sequestration and groundwater recharge," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    6. West, Thales A.P. & Wilson, Chris & Vrachioli, Maria & Grogan, Kelly A., 2019. "Carbon payments for extended rotations in forest plantations: Conflicting insights from a theoretical model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 70-76.
    7. Aino Assmuth & Janne Rämö & Olli Tahvonen, 2021. "Optimal Carbon Storage in Mixed-Species Size-Structured Forests," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 79(2), pages 249-275, June.
    8. Luo, Li & Gao, Yuan & Regan, Courtney M. & Summers, David M. & Connor, Jeffery D. & O'Hehir, Jim & Meng, Li & Chow, Christopher W.K., 2024. "Emissions offset incentives, carbon storage and profit optimization for Australian timber plantations," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:87:y:2018:i:c:p:93-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.