IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v87y2018icp49-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Farm-forestry in the Peruvian Amazon and the feasibility of its regulation through forest policy reform

Author

Listed:
  • Sears, Robin R.
  • Cronkleton, Peter
  • Polo Villanueva, Fredy
  • Miranda Ruiz, Medardo
  • Pérez-Ojeda del Arco, Matías

Abstract

In 2015 the Peruvian government launched a new set of regulations associated with the forest law aimed to increase competiveness of the timber sector, ensure the conservation and sustainable production of timber on public and private forestlands, and improve rural livelihoods. Small-scale timber producers have been marginalized in the sector in the past, and the new regulations claim to provide pathways to formalization for these actors. We draw on policy analysis and field research in the central Amazon region of Peru using mixed methods to characterize smallholder on-farm timber production and evaluate the feasibility of the new regulatory mechanisms for formalizing small-scale timber producers. Through examining a case study on the production and sale of the fast-growing pioneer timber species Guazuma crinita, locally known as bolaina, we found a diversity of management practices, with the strongest reliance on natural regeneration in agricultural fallows, an informal supply chain, and no case of formal documentation at time of sale. We assessed that none of the new regulatory mechanisms will accommodate the sale of timber produced in agricultural fallow stands. We recommend the inclusion of fallow timber in the new forest plantation registry, which could result in the formalization of the supply chain and create an incentive to increase production by small-scale producers.

Suggested Citation

  • Sears, Robin R. & Cronkleton, Peter & Polo Villanueva, Fredy & Miranda Ruiz, Medardo & Pérez-Ojeda del Arco, Matías, 2018. "Farm-forestry in the Peruvian Amazon and the feasibility of its regulation through forest policy reform," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 49-58.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:87:y:2018:i:c:p:49-58
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.11.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934117302666
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.11.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tarin Toledo-Aceves & Manuel R. Guariguata & Sven Günter & Luciana Porter-Bolland & Leticia Merino, 2021. "Overcoming Key Barriers for Secondary Cloud Forest Management in Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Pokorny, Benno & Robiglio, Valentina & Reyes, Martin & Vargas, Ricardo & Patiño Carrera, Cesar Francesco, 2021. "The potential of agroforestry concessions to stabilize Amazonian forest frontiers: a case study on the economic and environmental robustness of informally settled small-scale cocoa farmers in Peru," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Dany A. Cotrina Sánchez & Elgar Barboza Castillo & Nilton B. Rojas Briceño & Manuel Oliva & Cristóbal Torres Guzman & Carlos A. Amasifuen Guerra & Subhajit Bandopadhyay, 2020. "Distribution Models of Timber Species for Forest Conservation and Restoration in the Andean-Amazonian Landscape, North of Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Robin R. Sears & Manuel R. Guariguata & Peter Cronkleton & Cristina Miranda Beas, 2021. "Strengthening Local Governance of Secondary Forest in Peru," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:87:y:2018:i:c:p:49-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.