IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v83y2017icp80-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing the financial returns from acacia plantations with different plantation densities and rotation ages in Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Maraseni, Tek Narayan
  • Son, Hoang Lien
  • Cockfield, Geoff
  • Duy, Hung Vu
  • Nghia, Tran Dai

Abstract

In Vietnam, planted forests account for >26% of total forest area, with approximately two-thirds of the plantation area managed by smallholders and 80% of plantation wood used for woodchip production. With increasing demand for timber for the construction and furniture industry, the Vietnam Government is seeking to encourage growers to increase the rotation age of plantations and produce higher quality timber so that it can meet its 2020 furniture export targets. Progress on this goal is however slow, with growers unsure about the financial case for increasing rotation age. Using a case study of the Ben Hai State Forestry Company (SFC), we compare financial returns from acacia plantations by the rotation ages of 5, 6 and 10years. The 5year rotation is for the sole purpose of producing woodchips whilst 6 and 10year rotations produce both timber and woodchips. Results show that all three types of plantation produce positive returns but the return from 10year rotation plantations (in terms of NPV and IRR) is much higher than those of others. By increasing the rotation age by 1year (6years total) and 5years (10years total) from the common practice of 5years, the net present values from the modelled plantations would increase by about 1.57 times and 4.24 times respectively. The reasons why smallholder grower are not responding to these apparent higher present values and policies that would promote long rotation age plantations are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Maraseni, Tek Narayan & Son, Hoang Lien & Cockfield, Geoff & Duy, Hung Vu & Nghia, Tran Dai, 2017. "Comparing the financial returns from acacia plantations with different plantation densities and rotation ages in Vietnam," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 80-87.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:83:y:2017:i:c:p:80-87
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.06.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934117300941
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.06.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prof. Harry F. Campbell, 1999. "Forestry Economics: Principles and Practice," Discussion Papers Series 265, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    2. Baral, Himlal & Guariguata, Manuel R. & Keenan, Rodney J., 2016. "A proposed framework for assessing ecosystem goods and services from planted forests," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PB), pages 260-268.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maraseni, Tek Narayan & Phimmavong, Somvang & Keenan, Rodney J. & Vongkhamsao, Vongvilay & Cockfield, Geoff & Smith, Hilary, 2018. "Financial returns for different actors in a teak timber value chain in Paklay District, Lao PDR," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 145-154.
    2. Nguyen, Hanh Tien & Ariyawardana, Anoma & Ratnasiri, Shyama, 2020. "Forest plantation owners' willingness to pay for hybrid nursery stock: The case of Acacia hybrids in Central Vietnam," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    3. Phimmavong, Somvang & Maraseni, Tek Narayan & Keenan, Rodney J. & Cockfield, Geoff, 2019. "Financial returns from collaborative investment models of Eucalyptus agroforestry plantations in Lao PDR," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Roland Cochard & Bien Thanh Vu & Dung Tri Ngo, 2021. "Acacia Plantation Development and the Configuration of Tree Farmers’ Agricultural Assets and Land Management—A Survey in Central Vietnam," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-39, November.
    5. Blackburn, David & Huong, Vu Dinh & Mendham, Daniel, 2020. "Returns to Vietnamese smallholder farmers from managing acacia plantations for sawn wood over 4-10 year rotations," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    6. Tham, La Thi & Darr, Dietrich & Pretzsch, Jürgen, 2021. "Analysis of Acacia hybrid timber value chains: A case study of woodchip and furniture production in central Vietnam," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    7. Ronja Herzberg & Tung Gia Pham & Martin Kappas & Daniel Wyss & Chau Thi Minh Tran, 2019. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Land Evaluation of Potential Agricultural Land Use Types in a Hilly Area of Central Vietnam," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-25, June.
    8. Maraseni, Tek Narayan & Son, Hoang Lien & Cockfield, Geoff & Duy, Hung Vu & Nghia, Tran Dai, 2017. "The financial benefits of forest certification: Case studies of acacia growers and a furniture company in Central Vietnam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 56-63.
    9. Cochard, Roland & Nguyen, Van Hai Thi & Ngo, Dung Tri & Kull, Christian A., 2020. "Vietnam’s forest cover changes 2005–2016: Veering from transition to (yet more) transaction?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    10. Dinh Le, Hai & Thi Mai Anh, Tran & Thi Hai Hien, Vo & Thi Van, Luu & Thi Mai, Ngo, 2024. "Analyzing determinants of long-rotation plantation decisions by local households in Quang Tri Province, Vietnam with Bayesian Networks," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    11. Cubbage, Frederick & Kanieski, Bruno & Rubilar, Rafael & Bussoni, Adriana & Olmos, Virginia Morales & Balmelli, Gustavo & Donagh, Patricio Mac & Lord, Roger & Hernández, Carmelo & Zhang, Pu & Huang, J, 2020. "Global timber investments, 2005 to 2017," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    12. Charlton, Ryan A. & Naghizadeh, Zahra & Ham, Cori & Wessels, C. Brand, 2020. "A value chain comparison of Pinus patula sawlog management regimes based on different initial planting densities and effect on wood quality," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruiz-Frau, A. & Krause, T. & Marbà, N., 2018. "The use of sociocultural valuation in sustainable environmental management," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PA), pages 158-167.
    2. Yao, Richard T. & Scarpa, Riccardo & Harrison, Duncan R. & Burns, Rhys J., 2019. "Does the economic benefit of biodiversity enhancement exceed the cost of conservation in planted forests?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Martín López Ramírez, 2016. "When does the integration of mitigation and adaptation in the land use sector actually makes sense?," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 46.
    4. Jacobs, Sander & Dendoncker, Nicolas & Martín-López, Berta & Barton, David Nicholas & Gomez-Baggethun, Erik & Boeraeve, Fanny & McGrath, Francesca L. & Vierikko, Kati & Geneletti, Davide & Sevecke, Ka, 2016. "A new valuation school: Integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PB), pages 213-220.
    5. Rosa, Josianne Claudia Sales & Geneletti, Davide & Morrison-Saunders, Angus & Sánchez, Luis Enrique & Hughes, Michael, 2020. "To what extent can mine rehabilitation restore recreational use of forest land? Learning from 50 years of practice in southwest Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. Zhigang Li & Jialong Zhong & Zishu Sun & Wunian Yang, 2017. "Spatial Pattern of Carbon Sequestration and Urban Sustainability: Analysis of Land-Use and Carbon Emission in Guang’an, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Edrisi, Sheikh Adil & Sahiba, Sheikh Arshiya & Chen, Bin & Abhilash, P.C., 2022. "Emergy-based sustainability analysis of bioenergy production from marginal and degraded lands of India," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).
    8. E. Ingrid Putten & Elizabeth Pinkard & Anthony O’Grady & Rebecca K. Schmidt & Ian Cresswell & Vincent Raoult & Matt D. Taylor, 2021. "Stakeholder perspectives on the value proposition of enterprise-level natural capital accounting for three primary industries," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 541-555, December.
    9. Ahammad, Ronju & Stacey, Natasha & Sunderland, Terry, 2021. "Analysis of forest-related policies for supporting ecosystem services-based forest management in Bangladesh," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    10. Eszter Tanács & Ágnes Vári & Ákos Bede-Fazekas & András Báldi & Edina Csákvári & Anett Endrédi & Veronika Fabók & Lívia Kisné Fodor & Márton Kiss & Péter Koncz & Anikó Kovács-Hostyánszki & János Mészá, 2023. "Finding the Green Grass in the Haystack? Integrated National Assessment of Ecosystem Services and Condition in Hungary, in Support of Conservation and Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-28, May.
    11. Lee, Jongyeol & Lim, Chul-Hee & Kim, Gang Sun & Markandya, Anil & Chowdhury, Sarwat & Kim, Sea Jin & Lee, Woo-Kyun & Son, Yowhan, 2018. "Economic viability of the national-scale forestation program: The case of success in the Republic of Korea," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PA), pages 40-46.
    12. Wubante Fetene Admasu & Annelies Boerema & Jan Nyssen & Amare Sewnet Minale & Enyew Adgo Tsegaye & Steven Van Passel, 2020. "Uncovering Ecosystem Services of Expropriated Land: The Case of Urban Expansion in Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-20, October.
    13. Maebe, Laura & Dufrêne, Marc & Claessens, Hugues & Maréchal, Kevin & Ligot, Gauthier & Messier, Christian, 2023. "The Navigate framework: How the ecosystem services and resilience concepts can help us navigate in the current crises," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    14. Edrisi, Sheikh Adil & Dubey, Pradeep Kumar & Chaturvedi, Rajiv Kumar & Abhilash, Purushothaman Chirakkuzhyil, 2022. "Bioenergy crop production potential and carbon mitigation from marginal and degraded lands of India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 300-312.
    15. Cholho Song & Sea Jin Kim & Jooyeon Moon & Soo Jeong Lee & Wona Lee & Nahui Kim & Sonam Wangyel Wang & Woo-Kyun Lee, 2017. "Classification of Global Land Development Phases by Forest and GDP Changes for Appropriate Land Management in the Mid-Latitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, August.
    16. Bohwi Lee, 2021. "Perception and Prioritization of Ecosystem Services from Bamboo Forest in Lao PDR: Case Study of Sangthong District," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    17. Beland Lindahl, Karin & Söderberg, Charlotta & Lukina, Natalia & Tebenkova, Daria & Pecurul, Mireia & Pülzl, Helga & Sotirov, Metodi & Widmark, Camilla, 2023. "Clash or concert in European forests? Integration and coherence of forest ecosystem service–related national policies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    18. Dai, Erfu & Zhu, Jianjia & Wang, Xiaoli & Xi, Weimin, 2018. "Multiple ecosystem services of monoculture and mixed plantations: A case study of the Huitong experimental forest of Southern China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 717-724.
    19. Cook, David & Davíðsdóttir, Brynhildur & Malinauskaite, Laura, 2020. "A cascade model and initial exploration of co-production processes underpinning the ecosystem services of geothermal areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 917-927.
    20. Qingjian Zhao & Zuomin Wen & Shulin Chen & Sheng Ding & Minxin Zhang, 2019. "Quantifying Land Use/Land Cover and Landscape Pattern Changes and Impacts on Ecosystem Services," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:83:y:2017:i:c:p:80-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.