IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v69y2016icp62-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimates of residual fibre supply and the impacts of new bioenergy capacity from a forest sector transportation model of the Canadian Prairie Provinces

Author

Listed:
  • Peter, Brian
  • Niquidet, Kurt

Abstract

Increasing interest in making use of forest sector processing residuals for renewable energy production has led to the need for careful analyses of fibre supply, and the ways in which existing forest sector firms could be affected by new sources of fibre demand. In this paper we present a forest sector transportation model of the three Canadian Prairie Provinces, and use the model to estimate residual fibre production, utilization and surpluses, as well as some potential forest sector impacts from bioenergy capacity additions. Under our base-case assumptions and using 2010 product prices, we estimate that 6.9 million cubic meters (round-wood equivalent) of processing residuals would be traded over the course of a year, with sawmills being the most significant source and pulp and paper mills being the most significant user. Approximately 33% of residuals would be used to produce bioenergy-related products (wood pellets, electricity sold to the grid, or internal electricity and power at pulp mills). Results show that some surpluses of processing residuals may be present in the existing supply chain, though the availability of these residuals is sensitive to lumber prices. At the same time, new bioenergy capacity itself may trigger higher sawmill output, making additional fibre available for both new and existing users. Roadside harvesting residuals are not an economically viable source of fibre under our base-case assumptions; however, their viability is sensitive to roadside processing costs and electricity prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter, Brian & Niquidet, Kurt, 2016. "Estimates of residual fibre supply and the impacts of new bioenergy capacity from a forest sector transportation model of the Canadian Prairie Provinces," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 62-72.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:69:y:2016:i:c:p:62-72
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.05.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934116300909
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.05.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sadorsky, Perry & Henriques, Irene, 2001. "Multifactor risk and the stock returns of Canadian paper and forest products companies," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3-4), pages 199-208, November.
    2. Latta, Gregory S. & Sjølie, Hanne K. & Solberg, Birger, 2013. "A review of recent developments and applications of partial equilibrium models of the forest sector," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 350-360.
    3. Frisk, M. & Göthe-Lundgren, M. & Jörnsten, K. & Rönnqvist, M., 2010. "Cost allocation in collaborative forest transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 448-458, September.
    4. Bredstrom, David & Lundgren, Jan T. & Ronnqvist, Mikael & Carlsson, Dick & Mason, Andrew, 2004. "Supply chain optimization in the pulp mill industry--IP models, column generation and novel constraint branches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(1), pages 2-22, July.
    5. Vila, Didier & Martel, Alain & Beauregard, Robert, 2006. "Designing logistics networks in divergent process industries: A methodology and its application to the lumber industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 358-378, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miguel Riviere & Sylvain Caurla & Philippe Delacote, 2020. "Evolving Integrated Models From Narrower Economic Tools : the Example of Forest Sector Models," Post-Print hal-02512330, HAL.
    2. Bernardine Chigozie Chidozie & Ana Luísa Ramos & José Vasconcelos Ferreira & Luís Pinto Ferreira, 2023. "Residual Agroforestry Biomass Supply Chain Simulation Insights and Directions: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Miguel Riviere & Sylvain Caurla, 2020. "Representations of the Forest Sector in Economic Models [Les représentations du secteur forestier dans les modèles économiques]," Post-Print hal-03088084, HAL.
    4. Miguel RIVIERE & Sylvain CAURLA, 2018. "Integrating non-timber objectives into bio-economic models of the forest sector: a review of recent innovations and current shortcomings," Working Papers of BETA 2018-26, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    5. Emily Hope & Bruno Gagnon & Vanja Avdić, 2020. "Assessment of the Impact of Climate Change Policies on the Market for Forest Industrial Residues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guajardo, Mario & Kylinger, Martin & Rönnqvist, Mikael, 2013. "Speciality oils supply chain optimization: From a decoupled to an integrated planning approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 540-551.
    2. Becker, Tristan & Lier, Stefan & Werners, Brigitte, 2019. "Value of modular production concepts in future chemical industry production networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 957-970.
    3. Mario Guajardo & Kurt Jörnsten & Mikael Rönnqvist, 2016. "Constructive and blocking power in collaborative transportation," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 25-50, January.
    4. Etienne Lorang & Antonello Lobianco & Philippe Delacote, 2023. "Increasing Paper and Cardboard Recycling: Impacts on the Forest Sector and Carbon Emissions," Post-Print hal-03832461, HAL.
    5. Padilla Tinoco, Silvia Valeria & Creemers, Stefan & Boute, Robert N., 2017. "Collaborative shipping under different cost-sharing agreements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 827-837.
    6. M. Fattahi & M. Mahootchi & S. M. Moattar Husseini, 2016. "Integrated strategic and tactical supply chain planning with price-sensitive demands," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 242(2), pages 423-456, July.
    7. Ghanei, Shima & Contreras, Ivan & Cordeau, Jean-François, 2023. "A two-stage stochastic collaborative intertwined supply network design problem under multiple disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Kyritsis, Evangelos & Serletis, Apostolos, 2018. "The zero lower bound and market spillovers: Evidence from the G7 and Norway," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 100-123.
    9. Osman, Hany & Demirli, Kudret, 2010. "A bilinear goal programming model and a modified Benders decomposition algorithm for supply chain reconfiguration and supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 97-105, March.
    10. Zehetner, Dominik & Gansterer, Margaretha, 2022. "The collaborative batching problem in multi-site additive manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    11. Gao, Evelyn & Sowlati, Taraneh & Akhtari, Shaghaygh, 2019. "Profit allocation in collaborative bioenergy and biofuel supply chains," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    12. Joseph Buongiorno, 2021. "GFPMX: A Cobweb Model of the Global Forest Sector, with an Application to the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    13. Correia, Isabel & Melo, Teresa, 2016. "A computational comparison of formulations for a multi-period facility location problem with modular capacity adjustments and flexible demand fulfillment," Technical Reports on Logistics of the Saarland Business School 11, Saarland University of Applied Sciences (htw saar), Saarland Business School.
    14. Feng, Cheng-Min & Wu, Pei-Ju, 2009. "A tax savings model for the emerging global manufacturing network," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 534-546, December.
    15. Silvestre, Bruno S., 2015. "Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Environmental turbulence, institutional voids and sustainability trajectories," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 156-169.
    16. Nicklas Forsell & Ljusk Eriksson, 2014. "Influence of temporal aggregation on strategic forest management under risk of wind damage," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 397-414, August.
    17. Sosa, Amanda & Acuna, Mauricio & McDonnell, Kevin & Devlin, Ger, 2015. "Managing the moisture content of wood biomass for the optimisation of Ireland's transport supply strategy to bioenergy markets and competing industries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 354-368.
    18. Lucia BALDI & Massimo PERI & Daniela VANDONE, 2013. "Clean Energy Industries and Rare Earth Materials: Economic and Financial Issues," Departmental Working Papers 2013-07, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    19. Grigoriev, Alexander & Jung, Verena & Peeters - Rutten, Marianne & Vredeveld, Tjark, 2017. "On the Acceptance of Gain Sharing Methods in Supply Chain Collaboration," Research Memorandum 024, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    20. Nassim Mrabti & Nadia Hamani & Laurent Delahoche, 2022. "A Comprehensive Literature Review on Sustainable Horizontal Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-38, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:69:y:2016:i:c:p:62-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.