IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v17y2012icp3-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compliance with sustainable forest management guidelines in three timber concessions in the Venezuelan Guayana: Analysis and implications

Author

Listed:
  • Vilanova, Emilio
  • Ramírez-Angulo, Hirma
  • Ramírez, Gustavo
  • Torres-Lezama, Armando

Abstract

After more than 40years of natural forest management (NFM) in Venezuela, out of 16millionha of production forests only 10% located in the Guayana region is currently being managed with some consideration of sustainability. A recent survey of three private concessions in the Imataca Forest Reserve, based on partial consideration of criteria and indicators for the sustainable management of tropical forests, revealed that a new form of management is needed. Compliance with reduced impact logging was very low, with poor planning in logging operations detected in all cases, highly affecting forest stands and biomass recovery. A limited capacity for monitoring was also found. Social assessments showed that local communities in all cases demanded more participation in wood production benefits and tended to value provision services such as timber, food and water above other important regulations and cultural services. Here, three strategies are proposed as an effective way to partially modify NFM into a more integrated approach: 1) strengthening of institutional cooperation between private and public sectors and capacity building in the process of monitoring; 2) creation of a training framework for reduced impact logging techniques 3) a review of current legal structures and national policies related to NFM in order to favour small-scale operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Vilanova, Emilio & Ramírez-Angulo, Hirma & Ramírez, Gustavo & Torres-Lezama, Armando, 2012. "Compliance with sustainable forest management guidelines in three timber concessions in the Venezuelan Guayana: Analysis and implications," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 3-12.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:17:y:2012:i:c:p:3-12
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.11.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934111001833
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.11.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John A. Gray, 2002. "Forest Concession Policies and Revenue Systems : Country Experience and Policy Changes for Sustainable Tropical Forestry," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 14094.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Sen & Bogle, Tim & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2012. "Forestry and the New Institutional Economics," Working Papers 130818, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    2. Hansen, Christian P. & Lund, Jens F., 2011. "The political economy of timber taxation: The case of Ghana," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(8), pages 630-641, October.
    3. Catalina Georgeta DINU, 2021. "Forest Concession in Romania and Brazil," International Investment Law Journal, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 1(1), pages 49-55, February.
    4. Catalina-Georgeta Matei & Roxana-Anca Adam, 2012. "Public Works Concessions - Delimitation from Other Contracts," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 12(3), pages 139-146.
    5. Cashore, Benjamin & Nathan, Iben, 2020. "Can finance and market driven (FMD) interventions make “weak states” stronger? Lessons from the good governance norm complex in Cambodia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    6. Giudice, Renzo & Soares-Filho, Britaldo S. & Merry, Frank & Rodrigues, Hermann O. & Bowman, Maria, 2012. "Timber concessions in Madre de Dios: Are they a good deal?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 158-165.
    7. Kuusela, O.P. & Amacher, G.S. & Moeltner, K., 23. "Performance Bonds in Tropical Timber Concessions: Encouraging the Adoption of Reduced Impact Logging Techniques," Scandinavian Forest Economics: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, issue 44, May.
    8. Young, Carlos Eduardo Frickmann & Castro, Biancca Scarpeline, 2021. "Financing mechanisms to bridge the resource gap to conserve biodiversity and ecosystem services in Brazil," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    9. Kuusela, Olli-Pekka & Amacher, Gregory S. & Moeltner, Klaus, 2017. "Enforcing the rules in timber concessions: Performance bonding in the presence of corruption risk," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(P1), pages 52-64.
    10. Liu, Bingcai & Roopsind, Anand & Sohngen, Brent, 2024. "Overlapping extractive land use rights increases deforestation and forest degradation in managed natural production forests," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:17:y:2012:i:c:p:3-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.