IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v172y2025ics1389934125000346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How policy instruments affect forest cover: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Hou, Ruihuan
  • Ma, Guoyong
  • Tong, Lu

Abstract

The implementation of effective forest governance is of paramount importance for the expansion of forest areas. In this study, we employ a panel dataset comprising 31 provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions in China from 1999 to 2021, utilising text-mining techniques and a fixed-effects model, to examine the relationship between forest cover and policy instruments. Furthermore, we conduct robustness tests to ensure the validity of the empirical results. The results indicate that: (1) the implementation of comprehensive forest policy instruments in China has significantly contributed to the expansion of forest cover and ensured an increase in forest area; (2) with regard to the impact of policy instruments, economic and political instruments have exerted the most pronounced influence on forest cover, followed by coercion and didactic promotion; (3) state-owned forest areas are more responsive to policy instruments than collective forest areas, and the effects of policy instruments differ significantly between the two. This study underscores the crucial role of the government in promoting forest resource growth in China, reiterating the significance of multidimensional governance in increasing forest cover. Furthermore, it makes a valuable contribution to the quantitative analysis of forest policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Hou, Ruihuan & Ma, Guoyong & Tong, Lu, 2025. "How policy instruments affect forest cover: Evidence from China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:172:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125000346
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125000346
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103455?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:172:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125000346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.