IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v172y2025ics1389934125000024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What we can learn from India, a forerunner in community centric forest management: An insight for global forest policy and governance

Author

Listed:
  • Lalrinmawia, Nick
  • Lalengmawia, R.
  • Vanlalhluna, P.C.
  • Ralte, Vanlalhruaii
  • Lalremruata, B.C.
  • Lalnunmawia, F.

Abstract

Community-based forest management has gained global prominence and this commentary explores the socio-ecological dynamics of forest management in India, highlighting its role in biodiversity conservation, carbon sequestration, and forest regeneration. Community management has shown significant ecological improvements in areas of forest health, economic benefits and climate mitigation. However, certain challenges persist which includes anthropogenic disturbances, inequitable benefit sharing, and exclusion of marginalized groups. The integration of indigenous knowledge, economic factors, and gender equity into forest governance strategies is critical for the long-term success of these programs. Drawing on India's policy and community-driven experiences, this policy forum offers actionable recommendations for global policymakers to ensure effective forest governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Lalrinmawia, Nick & Lalengmawia, R. & Vanlalhluna, P.C. & Ralte, Vanlalhruaii & Lalremruata, B.C. & Lalnunmawia, F., 2025. "What we can learn from India, a forerunner in community centric forest management: An insight for global forest policy and governance," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:172:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125000024
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125000024
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103423?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:172:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125000024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.