IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v171y2025ics138993412400265x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forest diversity and the distribution of farm revenue - Empirical evidence from forest farms in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Tzong-Haw
  • Liou, Yu-You
  • Chang, Hung-Hao

Abstract

Forest diversity is important for the increase in biodiversity since higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with a greater variety of tree species. Although a sizable body of literature has focused on the biodiversity of forest farms, little is known about the relationship between forest diversity and the economic performance of forest farms. This paper contributes to this research topic by investigating the relationship between forest diversity and forest revenue using a population-based dataset of all registered forest farms in Taiwan. In contrast to previous studies, we pay attention not only to the mean returns but also the variability in forest farm revenue. We apply the instrumental variable method with the average elevation of a farm's township as the instrument to correct for endogeneity bias. We find that forest diversity reduces the mean level and the associated dispersion of farm revenue. Moreover, the magnitude of the effect is more pronounced for the latter. By further looking at labor use on the forest farm, we find that farms that plant a greater variety of tree species require more male labor.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Tzong-Haw & Liou, Yu-You & Chang, Hung-Hao, 2025. "Forest diversity and the distribution of farm revenue - Empirical evidence from forest farms in Taiwan," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:171:y:2025:i:c:s138993412400265x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138993412400265X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103411?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:171:y:2025:i:c:s138993412400265x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.