IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v72y2025ics1544612324016118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bilateral data asset matching in digital innovation ecosystems: A regret theory approach

Author

Listed:
  • Shan, Zidan
  • Wang, Yaqi

Abstract

This study addresses the bilateral matching of data assets with expected levels in digital innovation ecosystems, incorporating regret-avoidance behavior. First, given the potential hesitation between two parties throughout the matching process, expressing preference information using probability hesitant fuzzy sets is reasonable. Second, the Lance scoring function best captures the gap in expectation and satisfaction between the matching parties. Based on regret theory, we develop a matching strategy that considers both parties’ utilities and satisfaction levels. We construct an optimization model to determine criteria weights using a novel Lance distance metric. Subsequently, a multi-objective optimization model is formulated to maximize satisfaction while ensuring stability in the supply–demand matching process. A numerical example underscores the suggested method's effectiveness and shows its practical applicability in data asset matching scenarios. This study advances the field by integrating psychological factors and sophisticated fuzzy set theory into the decision-making process for allocating data assets in digital ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Shan, Zidan & Wang, Yaqi, 2025. "Bilateral data asset matching in digital innovation ecosystems: A regret theory approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:72:y:2025:i:c:s1544612324016118
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2024.106582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612324016118
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106582?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:72:y:2025:i:c:s1544612324016118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.