IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v98y2025ics1057521925000122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does public attention to biodiversity matter to stock markets?

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Chengchen
  • Chen, Yajie
  • Ji, Qiang
  • Zhang, Dayong

Abstract

Biodiversity has become an important issue in recent years, attracting great public attention. Arguably, biodiversity can be treated as a risk factor that should be priced in stock markets. To examine this issue, this paper first constructs a biodiversity attention index (BAI) based on information provided by the Baidu search engine and then examines its impact on the returns of listed firms in China. Specifically, the BAI is added to a capital asset pricing model as an additional factor, and then the model is used to analyse individual stock returns. By summarising the results from a bottom-up perspective, we find that BAI can affect stock returns to a certain extent and the impacts are highly heterogeneous across sectors. The pricing power of the BAI increases over time, with a growing number of companies affected. Further investigation shows that younger, larger firms and firms with better financial or environmental performance tend to be less sensitive to the BAI. Overall, this study provides important evidence to understand biodiversity–finance linkages and further highlights the need to incorporate public attention towards environmental issues into financial practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Chengchen & Chen, Yajie & Ji, Qiang & Zhang, Dayong, 2025. "Does public attention to biodiversity matter to stock markets?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925000122
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.103925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925000122
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.103925?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925000122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.