IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v97y2025ics105752192400807x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is internal control more efficient in employee-friendly firms?

Author

Listed:
  • Xu, Hanwen
  • Han, Xiaofang
  • Shen, Yongjian
  • Zhou, Minting

Abstract

This paper investigates whether the internal control quality of employee-friendly firms is higher. The existing literature in the field of corporate governance mainly focuses on the impact of management incentive and pays less attention to ordinary employees. Using data from China over the time period from 2007 to 2019, we identify employee excess compensation to measure employee-friendly firms and examine its impact on the quality of internal control. We provide new evidence that employee-friendly firms can significantly improve internal control quality. We also find that it is easier to achieve the goals of internal control in employee-friendly firms. We further find that employee-friendly firms can enhance internal control quality by increasing employee quality. In addition, we document novel results that employee-friendly firms reduce corporate risk and enhance innovation by improving internal control quality. Collectively, the study reveals the effect of employee-friendly firms on the quality of internal control, not only enriches the literature on employee motivation based on efficiency wage theory and enriches the literature on the determinants of internal control quality from the perspective of employees, but also provides important implications for internal control practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu, Hanwen & Han, Xiaofang & Shen, Yongjian & Zhou, Minting, 2025. "Is internal control more efficient in employee-friendly firms?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:97:y:2025:i:c:s105752192400807x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105752192400807X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103875?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:97:y:2025:i:c:s105752192400807x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.