IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v97y2025ics1057521924007361.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socially responsible investment and fund performance: The moderating roles of mutual funds' operating environments

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Dan
  • Li, Hong

Abstract

Mutual fund managers are increasingly inclined to demonstrate their social responsibility (SR) by adopting SR standards and integrating SR funds into investment portfolios. However, a debated question is whether the net effect of SR integration on fund performance is positive. This study proposes an inverted U-shaped relationship between SR integration and fund performance based on the trade-off between the benefits and costs associated with SR integration from the perspectives of legitimacy theory and transaction cost economics. We further hypothesise that this relationship is moderated by mutual funds' trading and regulatory environments. Our results from a sample of 1145 Chinese mutual funds support that fund performance improves with SR integration at low SR integration intensities but deteriorates as the integration increases from a medium level to a high level. Moreover, this inverted U-shaped relationship is weakened by market uncertainty but strengthened by the implementation of government-mandated SR disclosure. Our study provides practical guidance for investors, fund managers, and policymakers in striking a balance between financial performance and social responsibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Dan & Li, Hong, 2025. "Socially responsible investment and fund performance: The moderating roles of mutual funds' operating environments," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:97:y:2025:i:c:s1057521924007361
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924007361
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103804?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:97:y:2025:i:c:s1057521924007361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.