IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v96y2024ipbs1057521924006185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The backfire of mutual funds balancing financial objectives in ESG investments: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Luo, Qiling
  • Xue, Minggao
  • Xiong, Yeqin
  • Ge, Xiaowen

Abstract

In response to ESG (Environment, Social, and Governance) shock, mutual funds seem to be moving toward balancing the ESG objectives with traditional financial objectives. We observe such efforts in a sample of the Chinese active mutual funds from 2016 to 2022. These funds fulfill the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) requirements by investing in assets that combine superior ESG performance with excellent returns. However, the balance strategy falls short of its intended goals compared to normal ESG investments but rather leads to additional underperformance. Although our work reveals potential opportunities for balancing ESG and financial objectives, the lack of learning process and the limited attention make mutual funds miss such opportunities when they switch to balance strategy to speculatively cope with PRI constraints. This outcome suggests that in the face of the new investment trends driven by ESG shock, funds would pay a price for a superficial understanding of balance strategy and hasty actions.

Suggested Citation

  • Luo, Qiling & Xue, Minggao & Xiong, Yeqin & Ge, Xiaowen, 2024. "The backfire of mutual funds balancing financial objectives in ESG investments: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:96:y:2024:i:pb:s1057521924006185
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924006185
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103686?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:96:y:2024:i:pb:s1057521924006185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.