IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v95y2024ipcs1057521924003910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Objective acceptability indexes

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Shengli

Abstract

Based on the financial efficiency and leverage effect, this study classifies the measures of reward, risk, and performance into “simple” and “compound” types. We generalize three problems of observation inconsistency, overleverage deception, and dynamic manipulation behind classical simple measures (such as variability, LPM, VaR, and regression-based measures), and two problems of observation inconsistency and leverage variance behind traditional drawdown-based compound measures. We employ an axiomatic approach to answer the question of what undesirable influences measures should avoid, and complement the axiomatic framework with objective acceptability indexes by separating useless influences that do not add value for investors. We also develop new compound measures to solve the general problems with empirical evidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Shengli, 2024. "Objective acceptability indexes," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PC).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:95:y:2024:i:pc:s1057521924003910
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924003910
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103459?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Objective acceptability index; Observation consistency; Compound leverage invariance; Static leverage level manipulation; Overleverage deception;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:95:y:2024:i:pc:s1057521924003910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.