IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v101y2025ics105752192500095x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do green bonds have an advantage in information disclosure?

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Rongnan
  • Zhou, Qi
  • Xu, Weijun

Abstract

This study examines the rapid development of China's green bond market by leveraging semisupervised machine learning and text analysis methods. Using data on green bonds issued in mainland China from 2016 to 2021, the analysis highlights key differences in innovation disclosure between green and conventional bonds. Findings show that green bonds disclose green information-related at significantly higher levels—by 15 %—compared with conventional bonds, indicating a clear disclosure advantage. This advantage is notably stronger in bonds with third-party green certifications and a higher proportion of green project investments, underscoring the critical role of green attributes in shaping disclosure practices. The study further identifies heightened disclosure in bonds issued by nonstate-owned enterprises, firms operating in regions with supportive green bond policies, heavily polluting industries, and areas with more advanced financial development. Economic consequence tests reveal that enhanced green information disclosure positively impacts excess stock returns, reduces information asymmetry, and increases investor attention. These findings provide valuable insights for refining the institutional framework of the green bond market and advancing the development of a robust green financial system.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Rongnan & Zhou, Qi & Xu, Weijun, 2025. "Do green bonds have an advantage in information disclosure?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:101:y:2025:i:c:s105752192500095x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105752192500095X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:101:y:2025:i:c:s105752192500095x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.