IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v95y2022ics0149718922001239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Pick your team wisely”: A case study of a long-standing research-practice partnership

Author

Listed:
  • Melton, Theresa N.
  • Agans, Jennifer P.
  • Lawhon, Ben
  • Mateer, Timothy J.
  • Freeman, Stephanie
  • Taff, B. Derrick

Abstract

Research-practice partnerships (RPP) provide opportunities to connect researchers, practitioners, and/or community development professionals in meaningful ways, thereby improving the quality of research, evaluation, and practice in communities. Yet, there is still much to learn about how successful partnerships between researchers and practitioners develop. Historically, research on this topic has emphasized challenges that prevent RPP from developing to their highest potential, with limited information available on ways to promote RPP and how to ensure RPP are mutually beneficial for participants. However, research on partnerships more generally, such as multisector partnerships, can contribute meaningfully to the RPP field. We present an in-depth case study on a successful, long-term partnership. In this study, we pull from the broader partnership literature to explore contexts that are likely to promote partnerships, as well as the activities that can strengthen RPP. Findings focus on addressing ways to promote RPP and highlight the importance of preexisting factors, such as a culture that values both researcher and practitioner expertise, history, and chemistry between partners. Additionally, non-professional space and time, productive disagreements, clear but evolving roles, and shared power were found to strengthen collaboration within the partnership. Specific advice for anyone considering joining an RPP is also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Melton, Theresa N. & Agans, Jennifer P. & Lawhon, Ben & Mateer, Timothy J. & Freeman, Stephanie & Taff, B. Derrick, 2022. "“Pick your team wisely”: A case study of a long-standing research-practice partnership," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:95:y:2022:i:c:s0149718922001239
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718922001239
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emee Vida Estacio & Mike Oliver & Beth Downing & Judy Kurth & Joanne Protheroe, 2017. "Effective Partnership in Community-Based Health Promotion: Lessons from the Health Literacy Partnership," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Jennifer P. Agans & Anthony L. Burrow & Esther S. Kim & Caitlin Garbo & Melissa Schroeder & Stephanie Graf & Tim Davis, 2020. "“You’re going to burn some bridges if you come at it the wrong way”: Reflecting on the realities of research-practice partnerships," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(1), pages 36-52, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olivia L. Pastore & François Jarry & Jammy Zou & Jennifer R. Tomasone & Luc J. Martin & Véronique Pagé & Shane N. Sweet, 2024. "Examining Model Similarity for Exercise Self-Efficacy among Adults Recovering from a Stroke: A Community-Based Exercise Program," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-14, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olivia L. Pastore & François Jarry & Jammy Zou & Jennifer R. Tomasone & Luc J. Martin & Véronique Pagé & Shane N. Sweet, 2024. "Examining Model Similarity for Exercise Self-Efficacy among Adults Recovering from a Stroke: A Community-Based Exercise Program," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Don Nutbeam & Diane Levin-Zamir & Gill Rowlands, 2018. "Health Literacy in Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-3, November.
    3. Eike Quilling & Maja Kuchler & Patricia Tollmann & Anke Osterhoff & Janna Leimann, 2022. "Needs to Create Healthy Living Environments—A Two-Stage Delphi Survey in Europe to Identify Facilitating Factors and Barriers in Municipal Health Promotion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Leigh Tenkku Lepper & Diane King & Joy Doll & Sandra Gonzalez & Ann Mitchell & Joyce Hartje, 2019. "Partnering with the Health Professions to Promote Prevention of an Alcohol-Exposed Pregnancy: Lessons Learned from an Academic–Organizational Collaborative," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-12, May.
    5. Ilse Blignault & Hend Saab & Hanan Youssef & Heba Baddah & Klara Giourgas & Lisa Woodland, 2023. "“It Is Definitely a Good Program for Everyone from Every Community”: A Qualitative Study of Community Partner Perspectives on the Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) Mindfulness Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(16), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Carol J. Ward & Curtis Child & Bret L. Hicken & S. Matthew Stearmer & Michael R. Cope & Scott R. Sanders & Jorden E. Jackson, 2021. "“We Got an Invite into the Fortress”: VA-Community Partnerships for Meeting Veterans’ Healthcare Needs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-16, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:95:y:2022:i:c:s0149718922001239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.