IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v90y2022ics0149718921001105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Project PrIDE in Context: Evolution of Evaluation in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Multi-Jurisdictional HIV Prevention Demonstration Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Koenig, Linda J.
  • Flores, Stephen A.
  • Mulatu, Mesfin S.

Abstract

Over the past decade, CDC has been implementing a high-impact prevention (HIP) approach to HIV, directing funds towards activities with the greatest likelihood of reducing new infections and disparities. Corresponding to this shift, the Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention (DHAP) began funding a series of multi-site demonstration projects to provide extra support and evaluative capacity to select health departments to initiate new HIP programming, with the intention of ascertaining and sharing lessons with other health departments. In this paper, we provide context for the PrEP, Implementation, Data2Care, Evaluation (PrIDE) evaluation by describing the evolution of evaluation goals and activities across three prior demonstration projects, highlighting four areas of change: 1) integrated evaluation and program implementation; 2) local program evaluation in addition to cross-site performance monitoring; 3) prescriptive allocation of resources to support local program evaluation; and 4) expansion beyond single site program evaluation to identify effective cross-site programmatic strategies. Together, these changes reflect our own learning about achieving the greatest contribution from multi-site projects and set the stage for unique aspects of program evaluation within PrIDE. We describe these features, concluding with lessons learned from this most recent approach to structuring and supporting evaluation within CDC DHAP's health department demonstration projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Koenig, Linda J. & Flores, Stephen A. & Mulatu, Mesfin S., 2022. "Project PrIDE in Context: Evolution of Evaluation in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Multi-Jurisdictional HIV Prevention Demonstration Projects," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:90:y:2022:i:c:s0149718921001105
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.102015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718921001105
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.102015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ., 2019. "Fiscal federalism," Chapters, in: Federalism in China and Russia, chapter 2, pages 8-38, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Lars E.O. Svensson, 2020. "What Rule for the Federal Reserve? Forecast Targeting," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 16(6), pages 39-95, December.
    3. ., 2019. "Will the Federation Survive?," Chapters, in: Economics as Anatomy, chapter 20, pages 215-220, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abrosimov, Kirill & Baccioli, Andrea & Bischi, Aldo, 2020. "Extensive techno-economic assessment of combined inverted Brayton – Organic Rankine cycle for high-temperature waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    2. Koenig, Linda J. & Flores, Stephen A. & Mulatu, Mesfin S., 2021. "Project PrIDE in context: Evolution of evaluation in the centers for disease control and prevention’s multi-jurisdictional HIV prevention demonstration projects," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    3. Mota, Paulo R. & Fernandes, Abel L.C., 2022. "Is the ECB already following albeit implicitly an average inflation targeting strategy?," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 149-162.
    4. Lazarus, Jessica & Broader, Jacquelyn & Cohen, Adam & Bayen, Alexandre PhD & Shaheen, Susan PhD, 2022. "Advancing Road User Charge (RUC) Models in California: Understanding Social Equity and Travel Behavior Impacts," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt1pn404q5, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    5. Erceg, Christopher J. & Jakab, Zoltan & Lindé, Jesper, 2021. "Monetary policy strategies for the European Central Bank," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    6. Lindo, Jason M. & Pineda-Torres, Mayra, 2021. "New Evidence on the Effects of Mandatory Waiting Periods for Abortion," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    7. Lars E.O. Svensson, 2020. "Monetary Policy Strategies for the Federal Reserve," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 16(1), pages 133-193, February.
    8. Matteo Cacciatore & Dmitry Matveev & Rodrigo Sekkel, 2022. "Uncertainty and Monetary Policy Experimentation: Empirical Challenges and Insights from Academic Literature," Discussion Papers 2022-9, Bank of Canada.
    9. Curi, Claudia & Murgia, Lucia Milena, 2023. "Forecast Targeting and Financial Stability: Evidence from the European Central Bank and Bank of England," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    10. Michael Kiley & Frederic S. Mishkin, 2024. "Central Banking Post Crises," NBER Working Papers 32237, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:90:y:2022:i:c:s0149718921001105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.