IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v82y2020ics0149718920301543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Short report: Understanding the process of multilevel suicide prevention research trials

Author

Listed:
  • Zbukvic, Isabel C.
  • Mok, Katherine
  • McGillivray, Lauren
  • Chen, Nicola A.
  • Shand, Fiona L.
  • Torok, Michelle H.

Abstract

This paper reviews process evaluations associated with multilevel suicide prevention research trials. Process evaluations can provide important information about how multilevel suicide prevention models are implemented, their mechanisms of impact, and the context and elements of implementation that mediate effectiveness. Out of 42 papers identified, only four met selection criteria for including a process evaluation. Of these four, there was large variation in the level of detail provided, and only two studies specifically focused on the process of implementing a multilevelsuicide prevention model. Future trials should include targeted process evaluation, which can benefit a range of knowledge users.

Suggested Citation

  • Zbukvic, Isabel C. & Mok, Katherine & McGillivray, Lauren & Chen, Nicola A. & Shand, Fiona L. & Torok, Michelle H., 2020. "Short report: Understanding the process of multilevel suicide prevention research trials," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:82:y:2020:i:c:s0149718920301543
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718920301543
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101850?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:82:y:2020:i:c:s0149718920301543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.