IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v68y2018icp74-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

PhotoVoice is a feasible method of program evaluation at a center serving adults with autism

Author

Listed:
  • Krutt, Hannah
  • Dyer, Lindsay
  • Arora, Ayesha
  • Rollman, Jennifer
  • Jozkowski, Amanda C.

Abstract

The purpose of this small-scale pilot study, was to assess the feasibility of PhotoVoice as a participatory method of program evaluation for the Hussman Center for Adults with Autism (HCAA), a community-based center in greater Baltimore, MD. PhotoVoice is a data collection method that uses photography to give informants, in this case three adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), the opportunity to voice their opinions, concerns, and ideas for programs they participate in. This participatory approach serves to empower individuals and communities, and increases the likelihood that the generated information will be used and recommendations will be implemented.

Suggested Citation

  • Krutt, Hannah & Dyer, Lindsay & Arora, Ayesha & Rollman, Jennifer & Jozkowski, Amanda C., 2018. "PhotoVoice is a feasible method of program evaluation at a center serving adults with autism," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 74-80.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:68:y:2018:i:c:p:74-80
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.02.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718917302884
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.02.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:68:y:2018:i:c:p:74-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.