IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v59y2016icp88-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of selected faculties at Tehran University of Medical Sciences using CIPP model in students and graduates point of view

Author

Listed:
  • Neyazi, Narges
  • Arab, Prof. Mohammad
  • Farzianpour, Freshteh
  • Mahmoudi Majdabadi, Mahmood

Abstract

Evaluation of higher education is an increasing demand for information on academic quality, which contributes to accountability among authorities and affects universities ranking. In educational institutions, the purpose of education is producing knowledgeable students and improving quality of the university system. Among many evaluation models, the CIPP model or Context, Input, Process, Product model is very beneficial and recommendable method to educational evaluation. This is a descriptive study conducted in four selected faculties of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) (Public health, Nursing and Midwifery, Rehabilitation and Allied Medical Sciences), undergraduate educational departments in 2014. This research found out quality level of undergraduates courses in viewpoint of students and graduates and determined their weak points. Data were collected through researcher- made questionnaires. Collected data were then analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.

Suggested Citation

  • Neyazi, Narges & Arab, Prof. Mohammad & Farzianpour, Freshteh & Mahmoudi Majdabadi, Mahmood, 2016. "Evaluation of selected faculties at Tehran University of Medical Sciences using CIPP model in students and graduates point of view," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 88-93.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:59:y:2016:i:c:p:88-93
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718915300914
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fereshteh Farzianpour & Hossein Dargahi & Shadi Hosseini & Seyead Shahab Hosseini & Shayan, 2011. "Program Evaluation of Health Care Management: Is it adjusted for Students Needs?," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 3(2), pages 420-424, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iftikhar, Shandana & Fu, Yining & Naureen, Shazia & Cao, Yongguo & Zhou, Chuan, 2022. "Cascading of teachers training at higher education in Pakistan: An evaluation of a faculty professional development program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fereshteh Farzianpour & Roholah Askari & Amin Torabipoor Hamedani & Gholamosien Khorshidi & Sanaz Amirifar & Shadi Hosseini, 2011. "Accreditation of Emergency Department at a Teaching Hospital in Tehran University of Medical Sciences in 2010," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 3(3), pages 498-505, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:59:y:2016:i:c:p:88-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.