IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v35y2012i2p287-292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlates of perceived effectiveness of the Safe Schools/Healthy Students Initiative

Author

Listed:
  • Ellis, Bruce
  • Alford, Aaron
  • Yu, Ping
  • Xiong, Sharon
  • Hill, Gary
  • Puckett, Marissa
  • Mannix, Danyelle
  • Wells, Michael E.

Abstract

A three-level growth-curve model was applied to estimate perceived impact growth trajectories, using multi-year data from project and school surveys on outcome and program implementation collected from 59 sites and approximately 1165 participating schools in the Safe Schools and Healthy Students Initiative. Primary interest is to determine whether and how project-level and school-level correlates affect schools’ perceptions of the Initiative's effectiveness over time when the effects of the pre-grant environmental conditions, grant operations, and near-term outcomes are considered. Coordination and service integration, comprehensive programs and activities for early childhood development, and change in school involvement were found to be significant predictors of school-perceived overall impact when the effect of poverty was considered. Partnership functioning, perceived importance of school resources, and school involvement were found to be significant predictors of school-perceived impact on substance use prevention when the effect of poverty was considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Ellis, Bruce & Alford, Aaron & Yu, Ping & Xiong, Sharon & Hill, Gary & Puckett, Marissa & Mannix, Danyelle & Wells, Michael E., 2012. "Correlates of perceived effectiveness of the Safe Schools/Healthy Students Initiative," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 287-292.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:35:y:2012:i:2:p:287-292
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.11.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014971891100098X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.11.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:35:y:2012:i:2:p:287-292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.