Publishing systematic, pragmatic case studies in program evaluation: rationale and introduction to Part II of the Special Section
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Neigher, William D., 2003. "The process is the plan: defining strategic community futures," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 441-457, November.
- Morell, Jonathan A., 2003. "Evaluating the impact of an electronic business system in a complex organizational setting: the case of Central Contractor Registration," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 429-440, November.
- Campbell, Martha & Patton, Michael Quinn & Patrizi, Patricia, 2003. "Changing stakeholder needs and changing evaluator roles: the Central Valley Partnership of the James Irvine foundation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 459-469, November.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Randolph, Justus J. & Eronen, Pasi J., 2007. "Developing the Learning Door: A case study in youth participatory program planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 55-65, February.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Fishman, Daniel B. & Neigher, William D., 2004. "Publishing systematic, pragmatic case studies in program evaluation: collatoral on a `promisory note'," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 105-113, February.
- Carlos J. L. Balsas & Anthony Swingruber & Yen-Fu Lin, 2018. "Evaluating local workforce development programs in Upstate New York, USA," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 33(4), pages 349-366, June.
- Cherniss, Cary & Fishman, Daniel B., 2004. "The Mesquite `MicroSociety' school: identifying organizational factors that facilitate successful adoption of an innovative program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 79-88, February.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:27:y:2004:i:1:p:59-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.