IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v15y1992i1p61-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Field experiences in evaluation courses : Increasing their value to students and sponsors

Author

Listed:
  • Morris, Michael

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Morris, Michael, 1992. "Field experiences in evaluation courses : Increasing their value to students and sponsors," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 61-66, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:15:y:1992:i:1:p:61-66
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0149-7189(92)90061-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Morris, Michael, 2004. "Not drinking the poison you name: reflections on teaching ethics to evaluators in for-profit settings," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 365-369, August.
    2. Sowl, Stephanie & Amrein-Beardsley, Audrey & Collins, Clarin, 2022. "Teaching program evaluation: How blending theory and practice enhance student-evaluator competencies in an education policy graduate program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. King, Jean A. & Ayoo, Sandra, 2020. "What do we know about evaluator education? A review of peer-reviewed publications (1978–2018)," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:15:y:1992:i:1:p:61-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.