IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v12y1989i4p375-377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A context and boundaries for a theory-driven approach to validity

Author

Listed:
  • Patton, Michael Quinn

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Patton, Michael Quinn, 1989. "A context and boundaries for a theory-driven approach to validity," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 375-377, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:12:y:1989:i:4:p:375-377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0149-7189(89)90054-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carol H. Weiss, 1997. "How Can Theory-Based Evaluation Make Greater Headway?," Evaluation Review, , vol. 21(4), pages 501-524, August.
    2. Salvador Moscoso & Francisco Tello & José López, 2006. "Using Generalizability Theory to Assess the Validity of the Evaluation Process," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 315-329, June.
    3. Downes, Jenni & Gullickson, Amy M., 2022. "What does it mean for an evaluation to be ‘valid’? A critical synthesis of evaluation literature," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:12:y:1989:i:4:p:375-377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.