IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v110y2025ics0149718925000308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluation of a 9th and 10th grade Native American virtual pilot: Utilizing a culturally responsive and Inclusive Science model

Author

Listed:
  • Hjelm, Linnea L.
  • Francis, Carolee Dodge
  • Bareng-Antolin, Noehealani

Abstract

STEM pipeline programs that pair underrepresented youth with culturally responsive mentors have been shown to support students’ science identity development, belonging, and persistence. Yet, most scholarship focuses on undergraduates and advanced high schoolers. Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Disease, the STEP-UP Pilot recruited a cohort of 9th and 10th grade American Indian students to participate in a mentored introductory research experience. The Inclusive Science Framework provided the foundation for Pilot development and evaluation, with an emphasis on cultural responsivity and identity integration. American Indian mentors and mentees met virtually for six weeks with a curriculum that focused on building basic scientific research methodologies in the context of type 2 diabetes within Tribal communities. Our evaluation found that overall participation produced a positive impact for science interest, attitudes, and the translation of science into community.

Suggested Citation

  • Hjelm, Linnea L. & Francis, Carolee Dodge & Bareng-Antolin, Noehealani, 2025. "An evaluation of a 9th and 10th grade Native American virtual pilot: Utilizing a culturally responsive and Inclusive Science model," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:110:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925000308
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000308
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102563?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:110:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925000308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.