IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v110y2025ics0149718925000187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the expenditure decentralization in enhancing public service quality: Evidence from 29 province in China

Author

Listed:
  • Mai, Wenjun
  • Mai, Lijun
  • Chen, Yanpeng

Abstract

Insufficient and low public service quality in China has resulted in unfulfilled resident needs, necessitating an examination to improve public service quality. Thus, this study constructs a public service quality index for 29 provinces covering 2004–2020 to explore the relationship between expenditure decentralization and public service quality. Using Fixed effects model, OLS and System Generalized Method of Moments (SYS-GMM) technique, this study reveals that expenditure decentralization has a significantly positive effect on public service quality, with a 1 % increase in expenditure decentralization leading to a 0.287 % improvement in public service quality. Additionally, the impact of expenditure decentralization on public service quality in the eastern and central regions is positively significant, while in the western region, expenditure decentralization does not positively affect public service quality. Furthermore, based on the public service quality theory, this study finds that FDI and fiscal self-sufficiency can enhance the relationship between expenditure decentralization and public service quality. The study provides evidence-based recommendations for policymakers to prioritize expenditure decentralization as a strategy to enhance public service quality, especially when considering attracting FDI and promoting fiscal self-sufficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Mai, Wenjun & Mai, Lijun & Chen, Yanpeng, 2025. "Assessing the expenditure decentralization in enhancing public service quality: Evidence from 29 province in China," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:110:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925000187
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000187
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102551?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:110:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925000187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.