IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v109y2025ics0149718925000060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Active ingredients in implicit racial bias training: Incorporating participant voice to promote engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Fix, Rebecca L.
  • Palmer, Edward L.

Abstract

Growing recognition of the serious consequences of racism in the United States encourage organizations and agencies to move toward an anti-racist approach. Implicit racial bias trainings are one piece of the approach toward this end. While many such trainings are being conducted nationwide, it remains unclear what practices best encourage participation, engagement, and desired outcomes following implicit racial bias trainings. We collected data from 225 implicit racial bias training participants working in criminal legal, educational, health care, and corporate settings. At the end of the trainings, participants completed brief surveys measuring knowledge about implicit bias, ethnocultural empathy, and acceptability of racial bias. Written responses about what was liked and could be improved in the training were also collected and analyzed using inductive coding to arrive at codes, categories, and themes. Results suggest participant voice is integral in understanding how to engage participants in trainings. Participants described being engaged in the training through a targeted introduction to the topic and through stylistic considerations by the facilitator including modeling vulnerability and self-examination. Findings emphasize that what participants perceive to be best practices in such trainings integrate strategies through which we can educate adult learners, engage participants, and address a sensitive topic head-on.

Suggested Citation

  • Fix, Rebecca L. & Palmer, Edward L., 2025. "Active ingredients in implicit racial bias training: Incorporating participant voice to promote engagement," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:109:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925000060
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000060
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102539?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:109:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925000060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.