IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v109y2025ics0149718924001241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the effects of collaborative governance: Case of a digital education project

Author

Listed:
  • Bonny, Stéphane
  • Cahlikova, Tereza

Abstract

The introduction of digital curricula has become topical due to the increasingly pervasive role of ICTs in the society implying the necessity to develop digital skills from a young age. Because of the lack of in-house know-how, governments often need to rely on external actors providing digital education expertise. Organisational structures of such programs thus resemble collaborative governance regimes with distinct roles attributed to specific stakeholders. In this study, we explore cross-sector collaboration structures of the DigEd project aiming to introduce digital education in different cycles of compulsory and post-compulsory schooling on the local level in Switzerland. Findings indicate that the lack of leadership and of clarification of each partner’s role during the pilot phase of the project did not allow for the creation of a shared understanding among the involved partners and led to the domination of a limited number of influential actors. This tendency is confirmed through a graphic SNA analysis clearly illustrating the centrality of non-state actors. This contribution shows that it is not only the effects of projects that should be of interest to evaluators, but also their internal collaboration structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Bonny, Stéphane & Cahlikova, Tereza, 2025. "Evaluating the effects of collaborative governance: Case of a digital education project," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:109:y:2025:i:c:s0149718924001241
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924001241
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102522?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:109:y:2025:i:c:s0149718924001241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.