IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v101y2023ics0149718923001416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The extent to which the recommendations issued after the periodic evaluation of university programs are targeted, specific, measurable and unequivocal: An exploratory analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Bouchard, Chantal
  • Hamel, Marie-Claude

Abstract

Each year, Quebec universities conduct a periodic evaluation of their study programs and issue recommendations to improve the quality and relevance of these latter. Although these evaluations are commonplace in higher education institutions, there is little information about them and the resulting recommendations. To compensate this lack of convincing data, our exploratory analysis will look at the quality of expression of these recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Bouchard, Chantal & Hamel, Marie-Claude, 2023. "The extent to which the recommendations issued after the periodic evaluation of university programs are targeted, specific, measurable and unequivocal: An exploratory analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:101:y:2023:i:c:s0149718923001416
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718923001416
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102364?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brandon, Paul R., 1999. "Involving program stakeholders in reviews of evaluators' recommendations for program revisions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 363-372, August.
    2. Carmen Păunescu & Anna Nikina-Ruohonen & Yulia Stukalina, 2022. "Fostering Research with Societal Impact in Higher Education Institutions: A Review and Conceptualization," Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, in: Carmen Păunescu & Katri-Liis Lepik & Nicholas Spencer (ed.), Social Innovation in Higher Education, chapter 0, pages 153-178, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Toal, Stacie A. & King, Jean A. & Johnson, Kelli & Lawrenz, Frances, 2009. "The unique character of involvement in multi-site evaluation settings," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 91-98, May.
    2. Tri Minh Ha & Phuc Van Nguyen, 2017. "Factors Affecting Evaluation Influence in the Public Sector of Cam Lo District, Vietnam," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 309-318.
    3. Khuram, Shahzad & Rehman, Ch. Abdul & Nasir, Nadia & Elahi, Natasha Saman, 2023. "A bibliometric analysis of quality assurance in higher education institutions: Implications for assessing university's societal impact," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Tang, Hui-Wen Vivian, 2011. "Optimizing an immersion ESL curriculum using analytic hierarchy process," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 343-352, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:101:y:2023:i:c:s0149718923001416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.