IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enscpo/v77y2017icp130-139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying cost-competitive greenhouse gas mitigation potential of French agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Pellerin, Sylvain
  • Bamière, Laure
  • Angers, Denis
  • Béline, Fabrice
  • Benoit, Marc
  • Butault, Jean-Pierre
  • Chenu, Claire
  • Colnenne-David, Caroline
  • De Cara, Stéphane
  • Delame, Nathalie
  • Doreau, Michel
  • Dupraz, Pierre
  • Faverdin, Philippe
  • Garcia-Launay, Florence
  • Hassouna, Melynda
  • Hénault, Catherine
  • Jeuffroy, Marie-Hélène
  • Klumpp, Katja
  • Metay, Aurélie
  • Moran, Dominic
  • Recous, Sylvie
  • Samson, Elisabeth
  • Savini, Isabelle
  • Pardon, Lénaïc
  • Chemineau, Philippe

Abstract

The agriculture, forestry and other land use sector are responsible for 24% (10–12Pg CO2e per year) of anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions worldwide, with concomitant opportunities for mitigation. A scientific panel used deliberative methods to identify ten technical measures comprising 26 sub-measures to reduce GHG emissions from agriculture in France. Their abatement potential and cost are compared. The proposed measures concern nitrogen (N) management, management practices that increase carbon stocks in soils and biomass, livestock diets, and energy production and consumption on farms. Results show that the total abatement potential can be divided into three parts. One third of the cumulated abatement potential corresponds to sub-measures that can be implemented at a negative technical cost. These sub-measures focus on increased efficiency in input use including N fertilisers, animal feed and energy. The second third are sub-measures with moderate cost (<€25 per metric Mg of avoided CO2e). These sub-measures require specific investments or changes to cropping systems, but additional costs or lower incomes are partially compensated for by a reduction in other costs or by the production of other marketable products. The remaining third are high-cost sub-measures (>€25 per metric Mg of avoided CO2e). These require investment with no direct financial return, the purchase of particular inputs, dedicated labour time or involve production losses. Assuming additivity, the cumulated abatement is 32.3Tg CO2e per year in 2030, but only 10Tg (i.e. 10% of current agricultural emissions) when calculated under current inventory rules. This study confirms that a significant abatement potential exists in the agricultural sector, with two thirds of this potential at low or even negative cost. This is likely to be an underestimated as it is based on a status quo of the current agricultural system. Results also emphasise the need to upgrade inventory rules so that efforts to reduce emissions can be accounted for.

Suggested Citation

  • Pellerin, Sylvain & Bamière, Laure & Angers, Denis & Béline, Fabrice & Benoit, Marc & Butault, Jean-Pierre & Chenu, Claire & Colnenne-David, Caroline & De Cara, Stéphane & Delame, Nathalie & Doreau, M, 2017. "Identifying cost-competitive greenhouse gas mitigation potential of French agriculture," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 130-139.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:77:y:2017:i:c:p:130-139
    DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901117304288
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:77:y:2017:i:c:p:130-139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/environmental-science-and-policy/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.