IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enscpo/v57y2016icp70-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A policy review of synergies and trade-offs in South African climate change mitigation and air pollution control strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Klausbruckner, Carmen
  • Annegarn, Harold
  • Henneman, Lucas R.F.
  • Rafaj, Peter

Abstract

Climate change mitigation and air quality management are mostly addressed separately in South African legal acts and policies. This approach is not always coherent, especially in the context of other serious issues South Africa is facing, such as poverty alleviation. Policies implemented to mitigate climate change might increase negative health affects due to unanticipated outcomes (e.g. increased local air pollution), and these indirect consequences must therefore be taken into account when devising mitigation strategies. However, greenhouse gas mitigation policies can also have co-benefits and positive impacts on local air pollution. An evidence-based approach that takes into account greenhouse gas emissions, ambient air pollutants, economic factors (affordability, cost optimisation), social factors (poverty alleviations, public health benefits), and political acceptability is needed tackle these challenges. A proposal is made that use of an integrated climate/air pollution techno-economic optimising model, such as the Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollution Synergies (GAINS) model, may provide a rational decision support tool to guide policy makers into effective strategies for combined Climate Change and Air Quality mitigation measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Klausbruckner, Carmen & Annegarn, Harold & Henneman, Lucas R.F. & Rafaj, Peter, 2016. "A policy review of synergies and trade-offs in South African climate change mitigation and air pollution control strategies," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 70-78.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:57:y:2016:i:c:p:70-78
    DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.12.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901115301180
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.12.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joana Portugal-Pereira & Alexandre Koberle & André F. P. Lucena & Pedro R. R. Rochedo & Mariana Império & Ana Monteiro Carsalade & Roberto Schaeffer & Peter Rafaj, 2018. "Interactions between global climate change strategies and local air pollution: lessons learnt from the expansion of the power sector in Brazil," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 293-309, May.
    2. Yunsheng Xie & Peng Wang & Yi Dou & Lei Yang & Songyan Ren & Daiqing Zhao, 2022. "Assessment on the Cost Synergies and Impacts among Measures on Energy Conservation, Decarbonization, and Air Pollutant Reductions Using an MCEE Model: A Case of Guangzhou, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Jiang, Keyang & Zhou, Ying & Zhang, Zhihui & Chen, Shaoqing & Qiu, Rongliang, 2024. "Simulating the economic and health impacts of synergistic emission reduction from accelerated energy transition in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area between 2020 and 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 364(C).
    4. Xiaochen Gong & Yunxia Liu & Tao Sun, 2020. "Evaluating Climate Change Governance Using the “Polity–Policy–Politics” Framework: A Comparative Study of China and the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Kai Wan & Yanjun Bu, 2024. "Environmental Policy Overlays and Urban Pollution and Carbon Reduction—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Jean C. Bikomeye & Caitlin S. Rublee & Kirsten M. M. Beyer, 2021. "Positive Externalities of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation for Human Health: A Review and Conceptual Framework for Public Health Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-29, March.
    7. Li Li & Peng Deng & Jun Wang & Zixuan Wang & Junwei Sun, 2021. "Retrospect and Outlook of Research on Regional Haze Pollution in China: A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-27, November.
    8. Yanmin Shao & Song Han, 2019. "The Synergy in the Economic Production System: An Empirical Study with Chinese Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-12, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:57:y:2016:i:c:p:70-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/environmental-science-and-policy/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.