IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enscpo/v55y2016ip1p258-265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of historical socio-economic development policies on eco-environment in great Dunhuang region of China

Author

Listed:
  • Ding, Wenguang
  • Yu, Huailiang
  • Zhao, Chen
  • Xu, Hao
  • Chen, Lizhen
  • Xu, Luan

Abstract

Through methods of historical literature research from 2 B.C. to 1934 A.D. (i.e. from Western Han dynasty to the Republic of China) in the Great Dunhuang region, the authors of this paper made a systematic research for the first time of the impacts that the historical socio-economic development policies had on the eco-environment in Great Dunhuang region in China. A conclusion is drawn that historical socio-economic development policies in Great Dunhuang region changed dramatically with evolution of feudal dynasties. Prior to Western Han dynasty, nomadic development mode dominated and gradually turned to semi-nomadic, semi-farming development modes. In later dynasties, animal husbandry was gradually reduced and farming became the major source for military and residential livelihood and income generation. Policies of Tun Jun (having garrison troops reclaim wastelands to gather grain), migration, taxation and farming were mainly responsible for the damage to the ecological environment in Great Dunhuang region. Moreover, evolutions of national culture in Great Dunhuang region were also one of the main reasons for the increasingly fragile eco-environment. When Great Dunhuang region was governed by nomadic peoples, animal husbandry was the mainstream and ecological environment remained stable with few sandstorm disasters. When nomadic culture was replaced by farming culture, grasslands and forests were intensively converted into farmland, leading to such disasters as soil erosion, land desertification and sandstorms. Consequently, farming civilization and nomadic civilization are two types of civilization created by human being in the process of development. They both need to adapt to the natural and climate conditions. Using one civilization to replace another would be a failure in natural resource management. The replacement of nomadic civilization might be one major driving factor for the present fragile ecological environment and frequent occurrence of natural disasters in Great Dunhuang region. Therefore, the stability of ecological environment has a close relation to a nation's traditional culture and its management behavior of nature.

Suggested Citation

  • Ding, Wenguang & Yu, Huailiang & Zhao, Chen & Xu, Hao & Chen, Lizhen & Xu, Luan, 2016. "Impacts of historical socio-economic development policies on eco-environment in great Dunhuang region of China," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(P1), pages 258-265.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:55:y:2016:i:p1:p:258-265
    DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901115300964
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lingyun Mi & Tianwen Jia & Yang Yang & Lulu Jiang & Bangjun Wang & Tao Lv & Le Li & Junfeng Cao, 2021. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Regional Ecological Civilization Policy: Evidence from Jiangsu Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:55:y:2016:i:p1:p:258-265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/environmental-science-and-policy/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.