IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v9y1984i9p895-907.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nuclear energy: Public controversies and the analysis of risks

Author

Listed:
  • Sills, David L.

Abstract

Energy is a social concept, the product of social, economic, and political processes that define certain raw materials as resources and thus convert them into usable energy. Like all social concepts, energy is controversial. Out of a wide range of controversies, three are selected for analysis here: 1.(1) the relationship of nuclear power systems to nuclear weapons proliferation;2.(2) the risks of terrorism and sabotage associated with the operation of nuclear power facilities, including threats to civil liberties; and3.(3) the problems associated with the long-term management of radioactive wastes. The final section of the paper describes various modes of analyzing risks and the perception of risks. It is concluded that it may take many decades to learn whether nuclear energy is as natural a source of electrical power as wells are of drinking water, or whether nuclear energy is a horror that mankind in the 1980s or 1990s took a hard look at and then backed away.

Suggested Citation

  • Sills, David L., 1984. "Nuclear energy: Public controversies and the analysis of risks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 9(9), pages 895-907.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:9:y:1984:i:9:p:895-907
    DOI: 10.1016/0360-5442(84)90021-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0360544284900215
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/0360-5442(84)90021-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:9:y:1984:i:9:p:895-907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.