IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v6y1981i1p73-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy analysis of four geothermal technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Herendeen, Robert A.
  • Plant, Randall L.

Abstract

We have applied standard energy analysis to 4 types of geothermal-electric technologies: liquid dominated, hot dry rock, geopressure, and vapor dominated. We find that all are net energy producers, i.e. they have an energy ratio exceeding unity, where energy ratio = net electric energy produced over lifetimeprimary nonrenewable energy inputs over lifetime (excluding geothermal energy itself)

Suggested Citation

  • Herendeen, Robert A. & Plant, Randall L., 1981. "Energy analysis of four geothermal technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 73-82.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:6:y:1981:i:1:p:73-82
    DOI: 10.1016/0360-5442(81)90104-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0360544281901043
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/0360-5442(81)90104-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Atlason, R.S. & Unnthorsson, R., 2013. "Hot water production improves the energy return on investment of geothermal power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 273-280.
    2. Herendeen, Robert A., 2015. "Connecting net energy with the price of energy and other goods and services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 142-149.
    3. Owen, Anne & Brockway, Paul & Brand-Correa, Lina & Bunse, Lukas & Sakai, Marco & Barrett, John, 2017. "Energy consumption-based accounts: A comparison of results using different energy extension vectors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 464-473.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:6:y:1981:i:1:p:73-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.