IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v322y2025ics0360544225013350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equipment capacity matching methodology and techno-economic analysis for a novel low-carbon multi-energy system with the integration of oxy-coal combustion power plant and power-to-gas

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Yuting
  • Zhou, Yuegui

Abstract

Oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) is a promising technology for CO2 capture, utilization and storage (CCUS), but the high energy consumption of oxygen generation limits its application. Power-to-Gas (PtG) allows to use excess production from wind or solar power, and thus enables capabilities to balance fluctuations from renewable energy generation, but requires CO2 as a synthetic feedstock and produces large amounts of byproduct oxygen. Integration of the two technologies can reduce the energy consumption of the OFC for oxygen production and provide CO2 for PtG, improving their techno-economics. A low-carbon multi-energy system with the integration of PtG and oxy-coal combustion power plant was first proposed to make full use of byproduct oxygen for oxy-coal combustion boiler (OCCB) from green hydrogen production of water electrolysis and to synthesize renewable fuels from green hydrogen and captured CO2. And then the capacity matching methodology of the main components was proposed to achieve multi-energy gradient utilization of electricity, heat and synthetic fuel chemical energy, and the internal integration of hydrogen, oxygen, CO2 and water. Two system schemes were proposed and simulated with the detailed models built with Aspen Plus and Matlab softwares. The energy and exergy analyses show that implementing Scheme 2 that uses CO2 compression and purification unit (CPU) and recovers waste heat from water electrolysis can increase renewable natural gas (RNG) product purity, total energy efficiency, and exergy efficiency by 9.4 %, 20.0 %, and 2.6 % compared to Scheme 1 with combustion deoxygenation, respectively, reaching 97.7 %, 67.4 %, and 51.7 %. Based on the capacity matching methodology, the capacity ratio of proton exchange membrane electrolysis cells to oxy-coal combustion boiler (PEMEC-OCCB) is 3.45 and the capacity ratio of RNG synthesis to oxy-coal combustion boiler (RNG-OCCB) is 0.72. Besides, the RNG production cost is estimated as 1610 $/t exceeding the current market price of natural gas, and it will be lower than the current market price when the PEMEC equipment prices drop to $250/kW in the future. The calculated results of the capacity matching methodology and techno-economic analysis can provide the guideline for the design and equipment selection of the low-carbon multi-energy system with the integration of oxy-coal combustion power plant and Power-to-Gas.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Yuting & Zhou, Yuegui, 2025. "Equipment capacity matching methodology and techno-economic analysis for a novel low-carbon multi-energy system with the integration of oxy-coal combustion power plant and power-to-gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:322:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225013350
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.135693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225013350
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.135693?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:322:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225013350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.