IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v319y2025ics0360544225004517.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining pathways for a climate neutral Europe by 2050; A model comparison analysis including integrated assessment models and energy system models

Author

Listed:
  • Mikropoulos, Efstratios
  • Roelfsema, Mark
  • Chen, Hsing-Hsuan
  • Staffell, Iain
  • Oreggioni, Gabriel
  • Hdidouan, Dan
  • Thellufsen, Jakob Zinck
  • Chang, Miguel Antonio
  • Fragkos, Panagiotis
  • Giannousakis, Anastasis
  • Chatterjee, Souran
  • Ürge-Vorsatz, Diana
  • Pfenninger, Stefan
  • Pickering, Bryn
  • Victoria, Marta
  • Brown, Tom
  • van Vuuren, Detlef P.

Abstract

The European Union's goal of achieving climate neutrality by 2050, outlined in the European Green Deal, is supported by numerous studies providing insights into pathways and emission reduction strategies in the energy sectors. However, model comparisons of such pathways are less common due to the complex nature of climate and energy modelling. Our study brings together integrated assessment models and energy system models under a common framework to develop EU policy scenarios: a Current Trends scenario reflecting existing policies and trends and a Climate Neutrality scenario aligned with the EU's emission reduction target. Both scenarios project reduced final energy consumption by 2050, driven by increased electrification and decreased fossil fuel usage. Electricity consumption increases driven by electrification despite the improved efficiency of electrified technologies. Models align on a shift toward renewables but diverge in technology and fuel choices, reflecting various approaches to reach net-zero energy systems. Furthermore, trade-offs between energy demand and supply mitigation strategies, as well as between renewable energy, e-fuels, and CCS technologies are identified. Considering these model variations, our study highlights the importance of consistent model comparison to offer reliable recommendations to policymakers and stakeholders. We conclude that model diversity is a valuable asset when used sensibly.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikropoulos, Efstratios & Roelfsema, Mark & Chen, Hsing-Hsuan & Staffell, Iain & Oreggioni, Gabriel & Hdidouan, Dan & Thellufsen, Jakob Zinck & Chang, Miguel Antonio & Fragkos, Panagiotis & Giannousak, 2025. "Examining pathways for a climate neutral Europe by 2050; A model comparison analysis including integrated assessment models and energy system models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:319:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225004517
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.134809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225004517
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.134809?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:319:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225004517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.