IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v317y2025ics0360544225002403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing building energy solutions: A guideline for choosing proper multi criteria decision making methods in energy problems

Author

Listed:
  • Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Shahabaddin
  • Firoozabadi, Bahar

Abstract

Improving building energy efficiency is one of the most efficient ways of reducing carbon emissions. Building performance may be enhanced through a variety of sustainable solutions, such as low-carbon technology and energy reduction measures. The assessment of such phenomena is very complex and must be considered from different sustainability criteria. MCDM methods are a proper tool to solve such problems. However, this tool suffers from the Rank Reversal (RR). In this phenomenon, the preference of the options changes as the option was added or removed. In this regard, in the present study, the rank reversal in six commonly MCDM approaches in energy sector including VIKOR, COPRAS, SAW, TOPSIS, EDAS and WASPAS was evaluated. In the present evaluation, 324,000 random problems were solved by six MCDM methods in terms of the probability of the RR occurrence. The results showed that the quantity of options and criteria has a significant effect on the probability of RR occurrence. Also, the RR occurrence was the lowest in WASPAS and the highest in TOPSIS. Finally, due to the nonlinear behavior of RR occurrence, a guidance chart was presented, based on which, for each number of options-criteria, the appropriate methods was proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Shahabaddin & Firoozabadi, Bahar, 2025. "Optimizing building energy solutions: A guideline for choosing proper multi criteria decision making methods in energy problems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:317:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225002403
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.134598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225002403
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.134598?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:317:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225002403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.